Why Conjugate a Real-Valued Wave Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noone1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of conjugating a real-valued wave function, specifically the function \(\psi(x, 0)\). Participants are exploring the implications of conjugation in the context of wave functions, particularly when the function appears to be purely real.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity and implications of conjugating a wave function that seems to lack an imaginary component. Some express confusion over the nature of \(\psi(x, 0)\) and whether it can be considered a complex number despite appearing real.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of wave functions and the mathematical properties of conjugation. There is a recognition that while conjugating a real number may seem unnecessary, it is still a valid operation. Multiple perspectives on the topic are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an assumption that \(\psi\) can take complex values, and participants are discussing the implications of this in relation to the specific function given by the professor. The discussion also touches on the potential complications of handling cases where values are purely real versus complex.

Noone1982
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I am perplexed. My professor told me that I can conjugate:

\psi \left( x,0 \right)

However, I am confused. There is no time dependence, there is no i. It is like saying

z = a + 0i
z* = a - 0i

It is rather useless to even say that and it seems also useless to conjugate something with no i in it. Am I missing something fundamental?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is rather useless to even say that and it seems also useless to conjugate something with no i in it. Am I missing something fundamental?
Just because it's useless doesn't mean you can't do it.

But I don't see why you think \psi(x, 0) is a purely real number. Why can't it be a complex number?
 
Why do I think it is a purely real number? It has no i in it. That probably seems like a silly answer as your post implies. Could you please enlighten me?
 
\psi is a function. There's no reason it cannot take complex values.

For example, it might be defined as:

\psi(a, b) := 3 + 4i

or

\psi(a, b) := b + a i

or

\psi(a, b) := e^{i (b - a)}

or any number of other things.
 
I realize that, but my professor says this can be conjugated:

\psi \left( x,0 \right)\; =\; \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin \left( \frac{2\pi x}{a} \right)

I see no "i" in that. I therefore see no way to conjugate it.
 
Where a is meant to be positive, real number? (And, I guess, I'm assuming \psi takes two real arguments)

Of course you can conjugate that; you had it right in your opening post. Just because it's "useless" doesn't mean you can't do it.
 
Yes, a is positive, real number. So:

\psi \cdot \psi \; =\; \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin \left( \frac{2\pi x}{a} \right)\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin \left( \frac{2\pi x}{a} \right)\; =\; \frac{2}{a}\sin ^{2}\left( \frac{2\pi x}{a} \right)
 
The congugate of a real number, by the way, is the same number.
 
James, yes that is my point. Why did my professor act startled and perhaps a bit angry when I told him it seemed useless to conjugate that psi?
 
  • #10
Because it's not really "useless". Just think: if you weren't allowed to conjugate purely real values, then you'd have to say:


The amplitude of the wave function, |\psi|^2, is given by \psi^* \psi, except at the values where \psi is purely real, in which case it is given by \psi^2.

Just think of having to attach these caveats to just about everything you say... and when doing problems, having to break every step into two cases, one where the value happens to be purely real, and one where it isn't!

Everything would be a horrible nightmare! Aaaah!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K