Why Did I Get the Newton's Law Problem Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsinCalifornia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Newton's law
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
PhysicsinCalifornia
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi, I needed to calculate this for my quiz couple days ago, but I didn't get the right answer. Professor told me that I set it up correctly, so I don't understand why I got it wrong. Can anyone help? I resolved this problem, so I just need to verify the answer. Thanks

Q: Block B, with mass [tex]m_b[/tex], rests on block A, with mass [tex]m_a[/tex], which in turn is on a horizontal tabletop. The coefficient of kinetic friction between block A and the tabletop is [tex]\mu_k[/tex], and the coefficient of static friction between block A and block B is [tex]\mu_s[/tex]. A light string attached to block A passes over a frictionless, massless pulley and block C is suspended from the other end of the string. What is the largest mass [tex]m_c[/tex] that block C can have so that blocks A and B still slide together when the system is released from rest?

Here is what I have so far:

[tex]\SigmaF = m_ca[/tex]
Block C
______
[tex]x:m_cg - T_c = m_ca[/tex]
[tex]T_c = m_c(g-a)[/tex]

Block B
--------
[tex]x: f_B = m_ba[/tex]
[tex]\mu_sN_B = m_ba[/tex]
[tex]y:N_b - m_bg = 0[/tex]
[tex]N_b = m_bg[/tex]

Block A
-------
[tex]x:T_A - f_A - f_B = m_Aa[/tex]
[tex]T_A - \mu_kN_A - \mu_sN_B = m_Aa[/tex]
[tex]y: N_A - N_B - m_Ag = 0[/tex]

Max [tex]m_c[/tex]
-------------------
[tex]T_C = m_c(g-a)[/tex]
[tex]T_A = T_C[/tex]

Now I need to solve for a:
-------------------------
[tex]m_Aa + \mu_kN_B + \mu_sN_B = m_c(g-a)[/tex]
[tex]m_Aa + \mu_k[g(m_A + m_B)] + \mu_s(m_bg) = m_cg - m_ca[/tex]
[tex]a = \frac{\mu_sN_B}{m_B} = \frac{\mu_sm_Bg}{m_B} = \mu_sg[/tex]
[tex]m_A(\mu_sg) + \mu_k[g(m_A + m_B)] + \mu_s(m_Bg) = m_cg - m_c(\mu_sg)[/tex]
[tex]m_A\mu_sg + \mu_k[g(m_A + m_B)] + \mu_sm_bg = m_c(g - \mu_sg)[/tex]
[tex]m_c = \frac{m_A\mu_sg + \mu_k[g(m_A + m_B)] + \mu_sm_Bg}{g - \mu_sg}[/tex]

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsinCalifornia said:
[tex]a = \frac{\mu_sN_B}{m_B} = \frac{\mu_sm_Bg}{m_B} = \mu_sg[/tex]

Is this correct?
With no slipping, the acceleration should be
[tex]a = \frac{m_C-(m_A+m_B)\mu_k}{m_A+m_B+m_C}g[/tex]
 
OlderDan said:
With no slipping, the acceleration should be
[tex]a = \frac{m_C-(m_A+m_B)\mu_k}{m_A+m_B+m_C}g[/tex]

Well, with my acceleration and your accerlation, I set those equal to each other and I got:

[tex]m_c = \frac{(m_A + m_B)(\mu_s + \mu_k)}{(1 - \mu_s)}[/tex]
 
PhysicsinCalifornia said:
Well, with my acceleration and your accerlation, I set those equal to each other and I got:

[tex]m_c = \frac{(m_A + m_B)(\mu_s + \mu_k)}{(1 - \mu_s)}[/tex]
So, I take it you accept my equation for (a). Can you see where it comes from? You should be able to reproduce it from your free body equations.
 
OlderDan said:
[tex]a = \frac{m_C-(m_A+m_B)\mu_k}{m_A+m_B+m_C}g[/tex]

Well, I see that [tex]m_A + m_B[/tex] comes from the two blocks on top of each other because block A is at rest relative to block B.
In that case:
[tex]T - f_k = (m_A + m_B)a[/tex]
[tex]T - \mu_kN = (m_A + m_B)a[/tex]
[tex]T - \mu_k(m_A + m_B)g = (m_A + m_B)a[/tex]
Plugging T with the equation that I had:
[tex]T_c = m_cg - m_ca[/tex] since Tension are equal
thus::

[tex](m_cg - m_ca) - \mu_k(m_A + m_B)g = (m_A + m_B)a[/tex]
Solving for a gives:
[tex]a = g\frac{m_c - \mu_k(m_A + m_B)}{m_A + m_B + m_c}[/tex]

That matches with your a