1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dynamics problem using Newton's third law.

  1. Oct 28, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Two packages at UPS star sliding down a 20° ramp. Package A has mass of 5.0 kg and coefficient of friction of 0.20. Package B has a mass of 10 kg and a coefficient of friction of 0.15. How long does it take package A to reach the bottom?

    2. Relevant equations

    N/A

    3. The attempt at a solution
    Here's my drawing of the diagram in the textbook:
    http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/802/dynamicsdiagram1.jpg/
    Here are my free-body diagrams of the forces acting on both boxes:
    Free-body diagram for box A: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/15/freebodydiagramforblock.jpg/

    where n is the normal force, FG is the force due to gravity, F_f is the frictional force, F_BonA is the force box b exerts on A, and F_g_x is the x component of the force due to gravity, as the y component of gravity balances out the normal force.

    Free-body diagram for block B:
    http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/256/freebodydiagramforblock.jpg/

    Where n is the normal force, FG is the force due to gravity, F_f is the frictional force, F_AonB is the force box A exerts on B, and F_g_x is the x component of the force due to gravity. The friction force and the force block A exerts on B oppose its motion.

    Now I begin to work, first starting with newton's second laws:
    [itex]\sum f_{A_{y}} = n - F_{G_{y}} = n - mg\cos\theta[/itex]
    [itex]\sum f_{A_{y}} = 0 [/itex] so, [itex]n = mg\cos\theta[/itex]
    That was for the y component, now for the x component:

    [itex]\sum f_{A_{x}} = F_{BonA} + F_{G_{x}} - F_{k_{A}} = m_{A}a_{A}[/itex]
    where F_{k_{A} is the kinetic friction on block A, and m_{A}a_{A}
    is the net force acting on block A.

    Now I further simplify this:
    [itex]\sum f_{A_{x}} = m_{B}g\sin\theta + m_{A}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{A}g[/itex]
    Now I substitute in the numbers and solve for the force:
    [itex]\sum f_{A_{x}} = (10kg)(-9.8m/s^{2})(\sin20) + (5.0 kg)(-9.8 m/s^{2})(\sin20) - (0.2)(5.0 kg)(-9.8m/s^{2}) = -40.5 N.[/itex]

    Okay, this is where I start to doubt my answer, but I continue to solve for the acceleration of box A:
    [itex]a_{A} = \frac{\sum f_{A_{x}}}{m_{A}} = \frac{-40.5 N}{5.0 kg} = -8.1m/s^{2}[/itex]

    Now I am even more doubtful, as the acceleration does not seem reasonable for the box given the circumstances.

    So I use one of the kinematics equations for constant acceleration to find the time it takes for the box to reach the bottom of the ramp:

    [itex]S_{1} = S_{0} + V_{0}\Delta t + \frac{1}{2}a_{A}\Delta t^{2}[/itex]
    [itex] 0 = 2.0 m + 0 + \frac{1}{2}a_{A}\Delta t^{2}[/itex]
    Rearranging and solving for t:
    [itex] t = \sqrt{\frac{-4}{-8.1}} = 0.7[/itex] seconds.

    The book's answer was 1.48 seconds. I know the book's answer is correct, but they did their solution in a completely different way. I want to know just exactly what I did wrong, what assumptions or inferences I incorrectly made, and where I can improve next time. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 29, 2011 #2

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The force on A from B is not equal to mBg sin (θ ). What would be the force on B from A then? There is a force of interaction FAB between A and B, the force from B to A is equal in magnitude with the force on B from A.
    The force of friction is μ n = μ mAg cos(θ ).
    Write out the equations both for A and B. The accelerations are equal. You have two equations for FAB and a. Eliminite the force of interaction and solve for a.


    ehild
     
  4. Oct 29, 2011 #3
    So, using Newton's second law for both blocks:
    [itex]\sum f_{A_{x}} = F_{BonA} + m_{A}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{A}g\cos\theta = m_{B}a_{B} + m_{A}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{A}g\cos\theta = m_{A}a_{A}[/itex]
    [itex]\sum f_{B_{x}} = F_{AonB} + F_{G_{x}} - f_{k_{B}} = -F_{BonA} + m_{B}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{B}g\cos\theta = -m_{B}a_{B} + m_{B}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{B}g\cos\theta = m_{A}a_{A}[/itex]

    Correct? If yes, so now I would just eliminate the force interactions?
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2011
  5. Oct 29, 2011 #4

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    No, its is wrong. Think of Newton's second law: The resultant of the forces acting on B equal to mass of B multiplied by the acceleration of B. Why is mBaB = FBonA? And why is the sum of forces acting on B equal to mAaA?

    ehild
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2011
  6. Oct 29, 2011 #5
    Because that is the force B exerts on A, and since that is that is the direction the net force points towards, that is the direction B will accelerate towards. As for your second question, how did you get that? Unless FAonB + mBaB = -FBonA + mBaB = mAaA ?
     
  7. Oct 29, 2011 #6

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Read your equations again and try to understand why are they wrong.

    ehild
     
  8. Oct 29, 2011 #7
    I just realized the mistake I made in my previous post. -FBonA + mBaB = 0, since -FBonA = -mBaB.

    Anyways, the sum of the forces acting on B should be equal to mBaB and the sum of the forces acting on A should be equal to mAaA, by my interpretations of course. I can understand due to the acceleration constraint, both boxes will have the same acceleration, hence aA = aB. But since mA ≠ mB, the net force that acts on both boxes is not the same. Correct?
     
  9. Oct 29, 2011 #8

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Wrong.

    Right.

    ehild
     
  10. Oct 29, 2011 #9
    So, if the sum of all forces on box B is mBaB and the sum of all forces on box A is mAaA? But, if that is the case, wouldn't the equations become:
    [itex]\sum f_{A_{x}} = m_{B}a_{B} + m_{A}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{A}g\cos\theta = m_{A}a_{A}[/itex]
    [itex]\sum f_{B_{x}} = -m_{B}a_{B} + m_{B}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{B}g\cos\theta = m_{B}a_{B}[/itex]

    Since FBonA = mBaB and FAonB = -FBonA = -mBaB?

    If that is also the case, wouldn't the equation for box B give me a constant as the unknowns will cancel with each other?
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2011
  11. Oct 29, 2011 #10

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    As I said nearly one hundred times, it is wrong.

    ehild
     
  12. Oct 29, 2011 #11
    Why is it wrong? All you've been doing is stating "wrong, wrong, WRONG" without ever saying justifying WHY it is wrong.

    How is it wrong? You seem to be implying that there isn't an action/reaction pair, that FBonA ≠ -FAonB. Then how is Newton's third law even relevant to this problem?
     
  13. Oct 29, 2011 #12

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    FBonA = -FAonB, but it is not mBaB what you keep on stating. The force B exerts on an other body does not accelerate B. Why should be mBaB=FAonB right? I asked the same in post 4 and explained what are the correct forces in post 2.

    ehild
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2011
  14. Oct 29, 2011 #13
    My mistake. So,
    [itex]F_{BonA} = m_{B}a_{B} + m_{B}g\sin\theta - \mu_{k}m_{B}g\cos\theta = m_{A}a_{A}[/itex]
    Since this is the sum of all forces for B which would imply that it is the same total force B exerts on A to cause it to accelerate. If this is not correct, please explain why rather than just stating "wrong, please try again". You have said I was right in saying that the forces acting on both objects are not the same, yet have also posted mAaA is equal to [itex]\sum f_{B_{x}}[/itex]
     
  15. Oct 29, 2011 #14

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Let's start again.

    Forces acting on A are: the component of gravity along the slope mAgsin(θ),
    friction: μmAgcos(θ),
    B with a force F, what we do not know.
    The sum of all three forces equals to maaA.

    The same holds for B, with the exception that it has a force from A which is equal to -F, and the sum of all forces equals to mBaB.

    [tex]m_Agsin(\theta)-\mu_A m_A g cos(\theta) +F=m_A a_A[/tex]
    [tex]m_Bgsin(\theta)-\mu_B m_B g cos(\theta) -F=m_B a_B[/tex]

    aB=aA=a

    There are only forces on the left-hand side and accelerations are only on the right-hand side of the equations. Do not mix them.


    ehild
     
  16. Oct 30, 2011 #15
    Thanks for that, ehild. That was really helpful.

    I just wanted to know if the same problem can be solved without using Newton's third or second law and just using energy and kinematics?
     
  17. Oct 30, 2011 #16

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The energy method can be used if you are sure that the bodies really move together. The method based on FBD and Newton's laws will give the force of interaction, too, and you can check if the bodies really touch each other. As B is behind A, B can only push A, so F has to be positive. Now A has greater coefficient of friction than B, so it needs an extra push to have the same acceleration as B. If the body A with greater coefficient of friction were behind B, it would lag after B and they would move with different accelerations.

    If you calculate the acceleration, than substitute it back into one of the original equations, you will find that B really pushes A.

    Try to apply the energy method. Take care, there are two different terms for the work of friction, one for A and one for B. At the end you get the final speed and use the equation 0.5(vi+vf)t=s to find the time.

    ehild
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Dynamics problem using Newton's third law.
Loading...