Why didn't my triple point experiment work?

In summary, the triple point diagram doesn't seem to be very reliable, and you would need a very high vacuum to get to the gas phase.
  • #1
gravenewworld
1,132
26
So I'm trying to come up with some neat experiments to perform for some kids and I was thinking of showing them the effect of different temperature and pressure on the phase changes of water. Specifically, I was interested in subliming water by freezing it in a flask under reduced pressure and then having it go right into the gas phase after heating it up. The triple point diagram looks like this:

http://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/phaseeqia/pdh2o2.gifSo I froze the water in dry ice down to about -70 C and then put the flask under vacuum. I let the flask warm up, but alas, it went back to the liquid phase rather than straight to the gas phase. What went wrong? Is it the vapor pressure of the water?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
You probably didn't have the flask under a hard enough vacuum. What were you using to pump it down?

The triple point diagram you were going off of doesn't look very reliable, as it doesn't appear to be to scale, and has no markings on the axises.

So, I looked up this one;

http://www.sv.vt.edu/classes/MSE2094_NoteBook/96ClassProj/examples/941.jpg [Broken]

According to it, you'd have to have that flask down to a vacuum of around 0.01 atmospheres, which is pretty low. Did you have any way of knowing the vacuum in the flask?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
LtStorm said:
You probably didn't have the flask under a hard enough vacuum. What were you using to pump it down?

The triple point diagram you were going off of doesn't look very reliable, as it doesn't appear to be to scale, and has no markings on the axises.

So, I looked up this one;

http://www.sv.vt.edu/classes/MSE2094_NoteBook/96ClassProj/examples/941.jpg [Broken]

According to it, you'd have to have that flask down to a vacuum of around 0.01 atmospheres, which is pretty low. Did you have any way of knowing the vacuum in the flask?

Yeah you are probably right about the vacuum. I just tried the experiment in the 10 minutes I had left before I went home. All I used was just the house line for the vacuum, which is probably not strong enough. I have no way of telling what the pressure is inside the flask, I will just have to go by what I see. Tomorrow I am going to try my high vac pump, which has a gauge on it. Attaining 0.01 atm should be easy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Yeah, definitely need a pressure gauge for this. Are you sure the flask can take that low a pressure? Don't need it imploding on you...
 
  • #5
LtStorm said:
Yeah, definitely need a pressure gauge for this. Are you sure the flask can take that low a pressure? Don't need it imploding on you...

Should be ok, we run them under high vac pumps all of the time with our products inside in order to dry them.
 
  • #6
gravenewworld said:
So I'm trying to come up with some neat experiments to perform for some kids and I was thinking of showing them the effect of different temperature and pressure on the phase changes of water.

Have you made any headway on the NO/CS2 demonstration?

Have you thought about using the http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k_4hMjYoMs&feature=related"? Kids always love that one. I demonstrated that on career day for years.

There was something I did that they liked even better... they liked it when I took my gloves off (inside out) and reversed them by quickly grabbing the opening and squeezing the partially air-filled glove. The fingers would 'pop' back into place. All that cool science was trumped by the popping of my nitrile gloves.

I wouldn't spend too much time on the triple point experiment. It's not too interesting watching a bit of frozen water remain frozen in a flask while a noisy pump is running. Like watching paint dry...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
chemisttree said:
Have you made any headway on the NO/CS2 demonstration?

Have you thought about using the http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k_4hMjYoMs&feature=related"? Kids always love that one. I demonstrated that on career day for years.

There was something I did that they liked even better... they liked it when I took my gloves off (inside out) and reversed them by quickly grabbing the opening and squeezing the partially air-filled glove. The fingers would 'pop' back into place. All that cool science was trumped by the popping of my nitrile gloves.

I wouldn't spend too much time on the triple point experiment. It's not too interesting watching a bit of frozen water remain frozen in a flask while a noisy pump is running. Like watching paint dry...
Eh, the barking dog experiment is far too dangerous to do. My company doesn't want to be liable for anything. I decided to do some experiments with sulfur hexafluoride. Suck it in and you will sound like a demon when you talk. You can also play a "magic trick" on the kids by saying that you have "invisible" water. I will pour the SF6 into a container and float a boat on top of it, so it will look like the boat is floating on nothing. I will then have a kid from the audience come up and take a beaker full of the "invisible" water from the container and pour it onto the boat. The boat will then sink. I am also going to try to supercool some water. After shaking a container of super cooled water, you get a nice visual effect from the rapid growth of the ice crystal(s) like in this movie:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7744912809567427565&q=supercooled+water&ei=ki0JSN_HNJCUrgK1y_DiDg&hl=en [Broken]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9017318279139425313&q=supercooled+water&ei=qy0JSIaCC4H4rQLezazzDg&hl=en [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. Why didn't my triple point experiment reach equilibrium?

There could be several reasons for this. It is possible that your equipment was not calibrated properly or was not sensitive enough to detect the small changes in temperature and pressure needed for the triple point to occur. It is also possible that there were impurities in your sample or that the conditions were not precisely controlled.

2. What is the importance of controlling temperature and pressure in a triple point experiment?

In a triple point experiment, the substance must be at a specific temperature and pressure for all three phases (solid, liquid, and gas) to coexist in equilibrium. Any deviation from these conditions can result in the formation of only two phases, which will not accurately represent the triple point of the substance.

3. How can I improve the accuracy of my triple point experiment?

To improve the accuracy of your triple point experiment, you can use more precise and calibrated equipment, ensure that your sample is pure, and carefully control the temperature and pressure within the experimental setup. It is also important to repeat the experiment multiple times and take an average of the results to minimize any errors.

4. Can the triple point of a substance vary under different conditions?

Yes, the triple point of a substance can vary under different conditions such as atmospheric pressure, purity of the sample, and the presence of other substances in the surrounding environment. This is why it is important to carefully control and monitor these conditions during a triple point experiment.

5. What are some applications of triple point experiments?

Triple point experiments are commonly used in the fields of thermodynamics, material science, and chemistry to determine the phase boundaries and critical points of substances. This information is essential for understanding the behavior and properties of these substances, as well as for developing new materials and technologies.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Chemistry
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
695
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
781
Back
Top