Why do accelerated charges emits a photon?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fisix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why accelerated charges emit photons, exploring both classical and quantum perspectives. Participants examine the conditions under which radiation occurs, the implications of the principle of equivalence, and the relationship between acceleration and photon emission.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether only negative acceleration leads to photon emission, suggesting that positive acceleration might involve photon absorption.
  • Others emphasize the need to understand the classical electromagnetic perspective before addressing quantum aspects.
  • One participant asserts that a charged particle accelerated by gravity does not emit electromagnetic radiation, leading to a reformulation of the question regarding the relationship between acceleration and photon emission.
  • Several participants discuss the principle of equivalence, arguing that a charged particle in freefall should not radiate, similar to a particle at rest in an inertial frame.
  • There are claims that the principle of equivalence may contradict special relativity and classical electromagnetic theory, though some argue that these theories are consistent with each other.
  • Participants explore the implications of acceleration on different charged particles, such as electrons and protons, and the potential differences in emitted radiation based on their mass and acceleration rates.
  • Questions arise about whether radiation would be detected from charges in various scenarios, such as in a gravitational field or in an accelerating frame.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the conditions under which accelerated charges emit radiation, with no consensus reached on the fundamental mechanisms or implications of the principle of equivalence.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved assumptions about the nature of radiation in different frames of reference and the dependence on specific definitions of acceleration and radiation. The discussion also highlights the complexity of reconciling classical and relativistic perspectives.

  • #31
Can you recommend any literature that supports this approach? That the only electromagnetically accelerated charge emits electromagnetic radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I just got a marvelous book on this very fascinating (and very complicated) issue of classical charged particles within the Maxwell theory. I highly recommend it since it's a very clear exposition of classical electromagnetics and on top solves (at least it claims so) the age-old problem of the selfconsistent dynamics of classical point charges and electromagnetic fields:

Rohrlich, F.: Classical charged particles, 3 edition, World Scientific Pub Co Inc, 2007
 
  • #33
Didn't know about his book. He also has a http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037596010100264X" in which he describes his method. I found some threads in PF and some papers in arXiv. It seems that:
  • as long as the particle is not too small, the semi-classical approach can be used. This is called the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation see e.g. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9912045" .
  • otherwise you should use the QED approach which is called Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac-Lengevin (ALDL) equation.
I was also checking the movement of charge particle in the gravitational field. There are many papers trying to derive equations to determine whether and when the particle does and doesn't radiate. For example http://iopscience.iop.org/0264-9381/21/16/R01". But in none of the sources I could see any hint, that confirms the post #21 and #4 in this thread.

Any ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K