Why Do Algebraic Tricks in Calculus Confuse Me?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mindheavy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by a student in understanding algebraic manipulations used in calculus, particularly in the context of integration techniques such as u-substitution and integration by parts. The focus is on how to approach integrals involving rational functions and the algebraic skills necessary to simplify expressions effectively.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty with algebraic skills that affect their ability to perform calculus operations, particularly with u-substitution and simplifying expressions.
  • Another participant suggests that the choice of u should be based on the denominator to eliminate x's from the integrand, indicating a need for clarity in substitution methods.
  • A clarification is made regarding the choice of u, with a suggestion to think about adding or subtracting quantities to simplify expressions before making substitutions.
  • One participant proposes that recognizing the complexity of the denominator can guide the choice of u, suggesting a specific substitution that simplifies the integral.
  • Integration by parts is introduced as an alternative method to solve the integral, with a detailed breakdown of the substitution process and resulting expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of algebraic manipulation in calculus but present different methods and perspectives on how to approach the problem. There is no consensus on a single best method, as multiple approaches are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the complexity of the denominator can influence the choice of substitution, but there is no resolution on the best approach to take for the specific integral discussed. The discussion reflects varying levels of comfort with algebraic techniques among participants.

mindheavy
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I'm three weeks into my Calculus II semester and we've just finished covering derivatives and integrals of ln and e^x. We haven't had the first test yet, which will be covering this material.

Things that trip me up are some of the tricky u-substitution methods, change of form, etc., or one in particular is: \int\frac{2x}{(x-1)^2}dx

A couple of classmates were working together the other day and the way one was showed to work this problem out was by changing the numerator to 2(x-1)+2 which is essentially 2x. The thing that gets me about this is, I have no idea how to look at that example and know that I need to perform that change of form, my mind doesn't even see that.

Mostly I feel like I'm getting the calculus concepts, aside from what I've mentioned above, however I have always been a bit shaky with algebraic skills. It seems most of my mistakes come from making "simple" errors or not seeing ways of simplifying something that would be obvious to someone with a more solid understanding of algebra.

It's an odd feeling. If I know what problems I'm having, it should be easy to go back to certain topics in algebra and build up on them, but it hasn't worked out that way when I try it.

I thought someone might have the right tip for me, maybe trying something different will help me progress a little easer. Until then, I'll keep working examples, as that's the only thing I know to do to get better at these.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You choose u based on the denominator and you need all the x's to go away in the integrand. Since u = x+1, you need to express everything in terms of (x+1) so that cancellation occurs and all x's are out of the integrand.
 
joeblow said:
You choose u based on the denominator and you need all the x's to go away in the integrand. Since u = x+1, you need to express everything in terms of (x+1) so that cancellation occurs and all x's are out of the integrand.

Do you mean x-1?

Anyway, in calculus, adding and subtracting or multiplying and dividing the same quantity are commonplace. Try to think of what you can add/subtract/multiply/divide to simplify the expression, and then make a substitution on what's left.
 
Whovian said:
Try to think of what you can add/subtract/multiply/divide to simplify the expression, and then make a substitution on what's left.

Thanks, I definitely see how in the example I used, doing what you say does make it simpler to work with. I'll try to get used to thinking this way more often. Maybe this is what's giving me difficulty, I'm not used to thinking this way to solve a problem mathematically..
 
Perhaps a little more direct way to look at it is to note that \int 2x/(x-1)^2 dx and, generally, the more complicated a denominator is, the harder the integral will be. So Let u= x- 1, du= dx. Now, from that, x= u+ 1 and so 2x= 2u+ 2.

The integral becomes \int (2u+ 2)/u du= 2\int du+ 2\int (1/u)du.
 
One more way to solve it is integration by parts.

\int u(x)v'(x)dx = u(x)v(x) - \int u'(x)v(x)dx

Substituting u(x) = 2x and v(x) = - \frac{1}{(x-1)}:

\int \frac{2x}{(x-1)^2}dx = - \frac{2x}{x-1} + \int \frac{2}{x-1}dx = - \frac{2x}{x-1} + 2ln(x-1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K