Why do I not get the same result when I use change in PE?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two blocks connected by a string over a pulley, where the original poster is exploring the relationship between work done and changes in potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). The context includes concepts from mechanics, particularly focusing on energy conservation and the effects of non-conservative forces like friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why the change in potential energy does not yield the same result as the work done on the block. They question the conditions under which change in PE equals work and express uncertainty about the role of height changes in free fall.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of non-conservative forces on energy conservation and the relationship between KE and work done on the system.
  • Others suggest isolating components of energy to clarify the relationship between KE and PE in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations of energy relationships in the system. Some guidance has been offered regarding the Work-Energy Theorem and the impact of friction on energy conservation, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's specific questions about potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that friction is a non-conservative force, which complicates the relationship between KE and PE. There is also mention of specific conditions under which change in PE may equal work, indicating that assumptions about the system's movement and forces are under examination.

Faris Tulbah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I found the answer to this problem using the change in KE, but when I try to relate the work done on the 12.0-N block in terms of potential energy i don't get the same result. Is the change potential energy not equal to the work done? I would also like to know what situations is the change PE equal to work. I know that if an object height isn't changing then i wouldn't need PE, but is this also true in free fall? Thank you!

1. Homework Statement

Two blocks are connected by a very light string passing over a massless and frictionless pulley (Figure (Figure 1)). The 20.0-N block moves 75.0 cm to the right and the 12.0-N block moves 75.0 cm downward.

Find the total work done on 12.0-N block if μs=0.500 and μk=0.325 between the table and the 20.0-N block.

Homework Equations


PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf + Elost
w=KEf-KEi
w=PEf-PEi ?
Elost=MGUxD

The Attempt at a Solution


I found velocity of for this system which was 1.59 m/s. Found that the work done was simply mv^2/2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Faris Tulbah said:
I found the answer to this problem using the change in KE, but when I try to relate the work done on the 12.0-N block in terms of potential energy i don't get the same result. Is the change potential energy not equal to the work done? I would also like to know what situations is the change PE equal to work. I know that if an object height isn't changing then i wouldn't need PE, but is this also true in free fall? Thank you!

1. Homework Statement

Two blocks are connected by a very light string passing over a massless and frictionless pulley (Figure (Figure 1)). The 20.0-N block moves 75.0 cm to the right and the 12.0-N block moves 75.0 cm downward.

Find the total work done on 12.0-N block if μs=0.500 and μk=0.325 between the table and the 20.0-N block.

Homework Equations


PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf + Elost
w=KEf-KEi
w=PEf-PEi ?
Elost=MGUxD

The Attempt at a Solution


I found velocity of for this system which was 1.59 m/s. Found that the work done was simply mv^2/2.
Hello Faris Tulbah. Welcome to PF.

Friction is a non-conservative force. Therefore, mechanical energy is not conserved, and the gain in KE is not equal to the decrease in PE.

You seem to have stumbled upon the "Work - Energy Theorem", which states that the change in Kinetic Energy is equal to the work done on the system by the net external Force.
 
So in other words the final work done on the object would be what was initially in the system minus the other variables that took away from the system. Since there is no PE in the "final" state of the equation we don't need to worry about it because the energy that would have been used up by it is being taken up by other variables in the equation, such as the other blocks KE and the energy used to counteract friction. To find the work on the object I would just need to isolate its components, KEf and PEf, right? Just want to make sure this concept is solid in my mind. Thanks for the response I really appreciate it!
 
Faris Tulbah said:
I would also like to know what situations is the change PE equal to work.

One case that this would hold true is if there's no work done on the system and the system is not moving.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K