Why do law schools have an admission quota?

In summary: This is supposedly contrary to the purpose of law itself, which is to provide a lay understanding to every citizen. Furthermore, there is a quota for certain programs in other fields, but not for law. This leads me to believe that law school administrators are missing something.
  • #1
Dr Lots-o'watts
646
0
It seems to me like every citizen should be able to understand and interpret law, so I don't get why they limit the number of students in law schools. Surely the school administrators would be able to manage an increase in admissions. In other fields, the numbers are set naturally i.e. people leave if unhappy, but law schools seem to feel a need to make a selection prior to entrance.

Why is that? I don't see how denying entry is beneficial to society. Isn't this contrary to the purpose of law itself? Surely, it's not an artificial limitation so as to adjust offer and demand for the graduating lawyers. They surely aren't that devious!

Anyway, given the reason for it, why then isn't there a quota in physics, engineering, political science, history, philosophy etc.? Are all these program administrators missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Probably to limit the supply and keep prices up for legal services. Vets do the same thing.
 
  • #3
So then they are an oligopoly!
 
  • #4
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
Surely the school administrators would be able to manage an increase in admissions. In other fields, the numbers are set naturally i.e. people leave if unhappy, but law schools seem to feel a need to make a selection prior to entrance.

Anyway, given the reason for it, why then isn't there a quota in physics, engineering, political science, history, philosophy etc.? Are all these program administrators missing something?
Where did you get the notion that graduate programs in physics, engineering, etc don't have quotas? Almost all schools have some predetermined notion of the number of applicants who will be accepted. There is an exception to this rule. They're called diploma mills.
 
  • #5
I think it is a little more formalized for certain fields, DH. It isn't the schools themselves, but the discipline:
The Atlantic Veterinary College accepted its first class in the fall of 1986. Approximately 63 students are selected each year for entrance into the four-year Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program. The admission process for veterinary studies is designed to select applicants considered most likely to succeed in the veterinary curriculum, subject only to Federal-Provincial agreements for regional quotas.
http://www.upei.ca/registrar/3_prof_degree_dvm

That's Canada, but the US is the same way. You can't just set up a veterinary diploma mill.
 
  • #6
If you have classroom space for 100 people, why would you admit 1000?
 
  • #7
Diploma mills are when the school accepts a 2.0 applicant who can pay thousands in tuition.

Art history undergraduate degrees at small colleges are diploma mills. Please know the difference. Law and vet school applicants can get rejected from average schools who have space and the applicants have 4.0s.
 
  • #8
Vanadium 50 said:
If you have classroom space for 100 people, why would you admit 1000?

Because 900 extra tuitions can buy the needed extra space.
 
  • #9
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
Because 900 extra tuitions can buy the needed extra space.
No, they can't. That's a whole building, plus a whole new set of teachers and staff. Plus a boatload of students complaining that the vast amounts of money they spent to get that advanced degree was a waste.

Schools are a limited resource, and so are good students. All those extra 900 students will do is slow down the more qualified 100.
 
  • #10
Or 9 extra schools if you prefer. Then we can see which graduated the slowest students.
 
  • #11
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
It seems to me like every citizen should be able to understand and interpret law, so I don't get why they limit the number of students in law schools. Surely the school administrators would be able to manage an increase in admissions. In other fields, the numbers are set naturally i.e. people leave if unhappy, but law schools seem to feel a need to make a selection prior to entrance.

Why is that? I don't see how denying entry is beneficial to society. Isn't this contrary to the purpose of law itself? Surely, it's not an artificial limitation so as to adjust offer and demand for the graduating lawyers. They surely aren't that devious!

Anyway, given the reason for it, why then isn't there a quota in physics, engineering, political science, history, philosophy etc.? Are all these program administrators missing something?

Going to law school is not necessary for obtaining a lay understanding of the law, it is necessary for becoming a lawyer. I am sure that there are several introductory courses at local colleges where one can learn about the law and basic legal philosophy and theory. Basic legal theory may even be taught in some philosophy courses.

The average person has no need for an advanced education in law, just in case. The average person probably would find much more use in taking automotive maintenance and repair classes yet they still tend to pay someone else to perform even the most simple level maintenance.

Russ said:
Probably to limit the supply and keep prices up for legal services. Vets do the same thing.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jan/08/opinion/la-oe-greenbaum8-2010jan08
According to this article the trend is opposite of the the impression the OP might give. It has been a typical joke for as long as I can remember that there are far too many lawyers. Things like "Ambulance chasing" came about because lawyers needed the work. In some states you don't even need to attend law school to become a lawyer, you just have to pass the bar. And in some few still you don't even have to pass the bar.
 

1. Why do law schools have an admission quota?

Law schools have an admission quota in order to maintain a certain level of competitiveness and quality within their student body. This ensures that students are challenged and pushed to excel, while also creating a diverse and well-rounded learning environment.

2. How is the admission quota determined?

The admission quota is typically determined by the law school's admissions committee, who carefully consider factors such as the school's resources, class size, and desired student demographics. They also take into account the number of applicants and their qualifications.

3. Does the admission quota vary between law schools?

Yes, the admission quota can vary between law schools. Each school has its own unique set of admissions criteria and priorities, which can affect the size and makeup of their incoming class. This is why it's important for potential applicants to research and understand the admission processes of different law schools.

4. What happens if a law school exceeds its admission quota?

If a law school exceeds its admission quota, it may result in a larger class size than intended. This could potentially impact the quality of education and resources available to students. In some cases, the school may also have to make adjustments to their curriculum or resources to accommodate the larger class.

5. Is the admission quota a form of discrimination?

No, the admission quota is not a form of discrimination. It is a method used by law schools to ensure a balanced and competitive student body. The admissions committee carefully considers all applicants and their qualifications, regardless of their background, to create a diverse and inclusive learning environment.

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
5K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
9K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
833
Back
Top