A question of why time dilates and what is described by it

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DerringDerpy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of time dilation as described by Einstein's theory of special relativity. Participants clarify that time is not an objectively existing entity but a measure of change relative to a reference frame. The conversation also addresses misconceptions about atomic behavior and the mechanics of time measurement, emphasizing that time dilation is a result of the constancy of the speed of light across different frames of reference. The discussion concludes that understanding time dilation requires a solid grasp of special relativity and its implications on measurements across varying speeds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Special Relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of reference frames
  • Knowledge of atomic structure and behavior
  • Basic principles of time measurement and clocks
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's Special Relativity and its postulates
  • Learn about the implications of the speed of light in different reference frames
  • Explore the concept of differential aging in relation to time dilation
  • Investigate atomic clock technology and its role in measuring time accurately
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the fundamental concepts of time and relativity, particularly those seeking to clarify misconceptions about time dilation and its effects on measurements in different frames of reference.

  • #31
Chris Miller said:
Wasn't suggesting it's "science" or doable, only trying to frame a thought experiment. Q: given I view your clock flashing slower, and you mine, whose does a 3rd frame's observer view as running slower?
And the answer is that it depends on the state of motion of the two of you relative to that observer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chris Miller
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
DerringDerpy said:
To use a metaphore, one can describe the Earth's orbit using pure math describing it as an ellipses. But that math alone can't tell you why Earth moves that way.

Agreed. But let's see where this takes us ...

Pure math won't reveal the existence of gravity in this, instead, you need to expand your view and start looking at other aspects of Earth and other celestial bodies, namely the sun, or have some other insight to figure out gravity. In this, gravity is part of why Earth has that orbit and not some other orbit.

Gravity can be used to explain why the orbit is an ellipse by pointing to two particular properties of gravity. One, that the force is directed towards the sun and two that the strength of the force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance to the sun.

So in one sense something is accomplished because we've used math to explain how ellipses follow from gravity. But in another sense we are no further along because we are still left with your original query. Namely, why does gravity have that particular direction and that particular dependence on distance to the sun. And we can go on with another explanation that uses math to explain how that follows from something deeper. But we are then still left with wondering why the deeper thing is true.

Likewise, relativity is the math of the result, it tells us how to predict things, but it doesn't tell us why things happen that way, and that is what I'm wondering.

Special relativity is more than just math. It's a complete explanation of, for example, time dilation. And it explains, using math, how time dilation follows from the two postulates.

So if you want to know why time dilates it's because of the two postulates: equivalence of inertial reference frames and invariance of light speed.

You are of course still left wondering why all reference frames are equivalent and why the speed of light is the same in all reference frames. Those things can be explained in terms of deeper reasons, but that has nothing to do with special relativity itself. Special relativity makes no attempt at explaining why the postulates are true, it simply explains how things will behave given the validity of the postulates. and it's the experimental verification of those conclusions that gives us faith in the validity of those postulates.

There is no known experiment you can perform to distinguish between a state of rest and a state of uniform motion. That seems to be a fundamental feature of our universe and the fact that time dilates is a consequence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hercuflea
  • #33
Chris Miller said:
Wasn't suggesting it's "science" or doable, only trying to frame a thought experiment.
Yes, but the problem is that framing actual physics scenarios using fiction is likely to lead you to misunderstandings and wrong answers. Best to stick with reality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
999
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K