Why do people cling so tightly to racism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zero
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motivations behind individuals who attempt to scientifically justify racism. Key points include the psychological need for some to reconcile lifelong beliefs, alleviate guilt, and bolster self-esteem through a perceived racial superiority. Participants express skepticism about the validity of studies that support racist ideologies, arguing that such research often lacks rigorous testing and is driven by an agenda rather than objective inquiry. Concerns are raised about the reliability of data and the biases of researchers, suggesting that many studies are funded by those with a vested interest in promoting racial propaganda. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of attributing socio-economic disparities to race versus considering factors like poverty and education. Overall, the dialogue critiques the misuse of scientific claims to perpetuate racism and emphasizes the need for critical evaluation of research methodologies and motives.
  • #151
Only in the US is it such a huge issue. Here racism happens, but it is a private thing. People think immigrants (conveniently only the colored ones) are causing crime on the streets. Media helps in this by mentioning the roots of a family, even when the offender is already second generation. I think it is really stupid. The media explains itself that they only mention roots when they think it is an important factor in the story.. well..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
We have got woman-day, why don't we have immigrant-integration-day?
 
  • #153
In the words of Tom Lehrer (massively cynical):
But during National Brotherhood Week, National Brotherhood Week,
It's National Everyone-smile-at-one-another-hood Week.
Be nice to people who
Are inferior to you.
It's only for a week, so have no fear.
Be grateful that it doesn't last all year!
 
  • #154
Originally posted by Monique
Only in the US is it such a huge issue. Here racism happens, but it is a private thing. People think immigrants (conveniently only the colored ones) are causing crime on the streets. Media helps in this by mentioning the roots of a family, even when the offender is already second generation. I think it is really stupid. The media explains itself that they only mention roots when they think it is an important factor in the story.. well..

The larger a minority is, the more threatening it can seem to the powers that be. The ultimate example of this was in South Africa during apatheid. The minority power-wise, was a majority of the population. Most European countries don't have large, easiliy recognizable minorities.

You see race problems around the world where there are large minorities - pureblood Indians in central America, Chinese in Malaysia or Vietnam, Whites in Zimbabwe, Philipinos in Kuwait and also in sections of countries - Turks in southern Germany, Chinese in western Canada. It isn't just in the US.

Njorl
 
  • #155
Originally posted by Njorl
Most European countries don't have large, easiliy recognizable minorities.
Roughly 50% of Amsterdam and Rotterdam (don't know the figure for other cities like the Hague) is composed of 'minorities', I consider that a large group..
 
  • #156
...but is there a single group that people can point at and hate and fear? A mixture of different peoples is inherently less threatening. It is harder to spread propaganda about immigrants in general than against a single group. Southern France has a large north African population, and a prejudicial backlash against them. If that population were the same size, but comprised equally of Algerians, Tanzanians, Philipinos and Mexicans, do you think the reaction would be as strong?
 
  • #157
Originally posted by Njorl
...but is there a single group that people can point at and hate and fear? A mixture of different peoples is inherently less threatening. It is harder to spread propaganda about immigrants in general than against a single group. Southern France has a large north African population, and a prejudicial backlash against them. If that population were the same size, but comprised equally of Algerians, Tanzanians, Philipinos and Mexicans, do you think the reaction would be as strong?
Well, it depends on where they are, and how close they are to becoming a "collective majority". You should hear the nonsense about the "death of the white race" that some people spew.
 
  • #158
Originally posted by Njorl
...but is there a single group that people can point at and hate and fear? A mixture of different peoples is inherently less threatening. It is harder to spread propaganda about immigrants in general than against a single group. Southern France has a large north African population, and a prejudicial backlash against them. If that population were the same size, but comprised equally of Algerians, Tanzanians, Philipinos and Mexicans, do you think the reaction would be as strong?
There is, people always seem to blame the 'Turks' or the 'Maroccans'. For some reason every person with a colored skin is perceived as of either one of these groups.

Other major immigrant groups are Antillean, Surinamese and Indonesian, but somehow they don't have this label. I don't believe their behaviour is any more or less criminal.
 
  • #159
i honestly started to read all the posts til i saw that there are 14 pages worth.

i'll add my 2 cents. FEAR seems to be the foundation of most illogical beliefs. it is probably fear of the unknown. this may have been necessary in primitive cultures to protect the clan.

we just ain't out-grown centuries of instinctual response. on the brighter side, look at the progress we made within the past 50 years compared to 20 (50?) centuries.

PEACE,
 
  • #160
Thanks everyone, especially Monique.

There are, undoubtedly, thousands of examples of disharmony between identifiable groups within a community, be it a town, county/province, state, or nation - whether the groups be defined by religion, caste, 'race', arrival (immigrant vs native), language, class, or anything else.

I'm *really* interested to know the extent to which modern nation-states contribute to keeping 'race' differences visible by asking people to state their 'race' when they conduct a census.

Data so far:
- Netherlands: no such question
- US: optional question; choice from a list (or 'other'); multiple 'races' allowed.
 
  • #161
Seems to me that political and religious (same thing really) beliefs cause more disharmony than skin colour. But those things, when you seek the causes behind the causes and campaigns, seem based in fear or greed.
 
  • #162
Originally posted by Adam
Seems to me that political and religious (same thing really) beliefs cause more disharmony than skin colour. But those things, when you seek the causes behind the causes and campaigns, seem based in fear or greed.
You couldn't be more right Adam.
 
  • #163
The collecting of race data by the Dutch government

Originally posted by Nereid
Data so far:
- Netherlands: no such question
--
Ethnic groups:
  • Dutch 83%, other 17% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)
[/color]--
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nl.html#People


Presumably, this data was obtained from the most-recent Dutch census.




- US: optional question;
--
D. Why does the Census need to know about race?
  • Race is key to implementing any number of federal programs and it is critical for the basic research behind numerous policy decisions. States require these data to meet legislative redistricting requirements. Also, they are needed to monitor compliance with the Voting Rights Act by local jurisdictions. Race data are required by federal programs that promote equal employment opportunity and to assess racial disparities in health and environmental risks. The Census Bureau has included a question on race since the first census in 1790.
[/color]--
http://www.census.gov/dmd/www/genfaq.htm#race


Presumably, since race data is critical data, the question of race is not optional.

A further clue that the question of race is not optional is the instruction on the http://www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/d61a.pdf to "Please answer BOTH Questions 5 and 6[/color]," question 6 being, "What is this person’s race? Mark one or more races to indicate what this person considers himself/herself to be.[/color]"




choice from a list (or 'other');
http://www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/d61a.pdf says, "Some other race — Print race[/color]." The some other race option is not an option which allows respondents to opt out of the race question.




multiple 'races' allowed.
--
Y. If respondents are allowed to mark more than one racial category, how will that affect response and reporting of race?
  • In the 1996 Census Survey, the Census Bureau tested revisions to the questionnaire that would allow multiple responses to the race question. There was no evidence that any of these experimental treatments had a negative effect on the final mail response rates. Also, we do not expect the instruction "mark one or more" to significantly affect reporting of race, because fewer than two percent of respondents in recent tests used this option.
[/color]--
http://www.census.gov/dmd/www/genfaq.htm#racecat




-Chris
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #164
Originally posted by hitssquad
--
Ethnic groups:
  • Dutch 83%, other 17% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)
[/color]--
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nl.html#People


Presumably, this data was obtained from the most-recent Dutch census.
What do you mean to say by that? Didn't I already mention where immigrants mainly come from in the Netherlands? Or should it be a top level state secret to a lot of people from Turkey come to the Netherlands?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #165
Originally posted by Monique
Originally posted by Nereid
Data so far:
- Netherlands: no such question
--
Ethnic groups:
  • Dutch 83%, other 17% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.)
[/color]--
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nl.html#People


Presumably, this data was obtained from the most-recent Dutch census.
What do you mean to say by that?
I meant to say that Nereid's claim that The Netherlands does not collect race population data seems to conflict with evidence of existence of official race counts.


Nereid had written:

--
...modern nation-states contribute to keeping 'race' differences visible by asking people to state their 'race' when they conduct a census.

Data so far:
- Netherlands: no such question [/color]
--




Didn't I already mention where immigrants mainly come from in the Netherlands?
Yes, but this might have been gleened from your personal observations just as well as it might have been gleened from official race population data collection. The fact of data regarding race population existing under the CIA Factbook's The Netherlands entry is more conclusive as to whether or not The Netherlands collects race population data.




-Chris
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #166


Originally posted by hitssquad
I meant to say that Nereid's claim that The Netherlands does not collect race population data seems to conflict with evidence of existence of official race counts.


Nereid had written:

--
...modern nation-states contribute to keeping 'race' differences visible by asking people to state their 'race' when they conduct a census.

Data so far:
- Netherlands: no such question [/color]
--

Yes, but this might have been gleened from your personal observations just as well as it might have been gleened from official race population data collection. The fact of data regarding race population existing under the CIA Factbook's The Netherlands entry is more conclusive as to whether or not The Netherlands collects race population data.

-Chris
Uhm, Chris, I don't see any races listed. I see ethnic groups showing country of origin. Looks like Nereid was correct.
 
  • #167


Originally posted by Evo
Uhm, Chris, I don't see any races listed. I see ethnic groups showing country of origin. Looks like Nereid was correct.
Just ignore reality, I doubt Chris is really all that interested.

Chris, do you have a viewpoint of your own?
 
  • #168
Australia and UK

Relevant publications; from the http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/auss...4424CA256ADC0007C535/$File/29030_Oct 2000.pdf.

The question asked in the Australian Census was: "What is [your] ancestry?" And the choices were:
- English
- Irish
- Italian
- German
- Greek
- Chinese
- Australian
- Other (please specify)
Instructions: "When answering this question consider and mark the ancestries with which you most closely identify. Count your ancestry back as far as three generations, if known. For example, consider your parents, grandparents and great grandparents."

I haven't yet found the UK question and instructions. However, the categories are interesting: there are two groups, "National" and "Ethnic". The former:
- English
- Scottish
- Welsh
- Irish
- British
- Other
- Not Stated.

Ethnic groups had two tiers; the top tier:
- White
- Mixed
- Asian or Asian British
- Black or Black British
- Chinese or Other Ethnic Group.

The word 'race' seems to be absent in both countries' Census.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #169
Re4: The collecting of race data by the Dutch government

Originally posted by Evo
Originally posted by hitssquad
the http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nl.html#People is more conclusive as to whether or not The Netherlands collects race population data.
I don't see any races listed. I see ethnic groups showing country of origin. Looks like Nereid was correct.
--
2 a : relating to community of physical and mental traits possessed by the members of a group as a product of their common heredity and cultural tradition <influenced by ethnic and cultural ties— J.F.Kennedy> <the boundaries along the West African coast were not plotted with regard to the ancient ethnic frontiers— A.H.Young-O'Brien> b : having or originating from racial, linguistic, and cultural ties with a specific group <Negroes, Irish, Italians, Germans, Poles, and other ethnic groups— F.J.Brown & J.S.Roucek> <displaced persons, 653 of them ethnic Germans— New York Herald Tribune> [/color]
--
Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, 3.0. Entry #2 for ethnic.


The CIA Factbook lists ethnicity largely as nation of origin, and nations are often relatively racially homogenous. The non-Dutch ethnicities http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nl.html#People...

--
Dutch 83%, other 17% (of which 9% are non-western origin mainly Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans, Surinamese and Indonesians) (1999 est.) [/color]
--

...relate to nations (or ethnically-distinct territories as in the case of the Caribbean islands of the Netherlands Antilles) with the following ethnic profiles:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/tu.html#People: Turkish 80%, Kurdish 20%
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/mo.html#People: Arab-Berber 99.1%, other 0.7%, Jewish 0.2%
Antilles: (see below)
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ns.html#People: Hindustani (also known locally as "East Indians"; their ancestors emigrated from northern India in the latter part of the 19th century) 37%, Creole (mixed white and black) 31%, Javanese 15%, "Maroons" (their African ancestors were brought to the country in the 17th and 18th centuries as slaves and escaped to the interior) 10%, Amerindian 2%, Chinese 2%, white 1%, other 2%
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/id.html#People: Javanese 45%, Sundanese 14%, Madurese 7.5%, coastal Malays 7.5%, other 26%



One might suppose that the government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands would differentiate between Turkish Turks and Kurdish Turks to the point that the CIA's listing of ethnic Turks consists only of Ethnic Turks and not of Kurdish Turks.

As far as the Antilles is concerned, of the Netherlands Antilles island of Curaçao, "About 85 percent of the population is black; the remainder are of Arawak, Spanish, and Dutch ancestry." (Microsoft Encarta 2002) The rest of the Antilles may similarly be largely black African and Spanish and Arawak, considering the history of the area.

Suriname seems genuinely divided among African blacks, Javanese, Europeans, and northern Indians. It might be enlightening to see whether the immigrant population from Suriname is similarly mixed and, if it is, how the government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands quantifies their racial backgrounds.

Indonesia may appear similarly mixed at first glance, but the apparent mixture might be reduceable to mainly a relatively homogenous Malay population and a relatively homogenous Han Chinese population, as the Microsoft Encarta 2002 entry for Indonesia migt seem to suggest:


--
The Javanese, who live mainly in central and eastern Java, are the largest ethnic group, constituting 45 percent of Indonesia’s population. On the western end of Java are the Sundanese, who make up 14 percent of the population and are the second largest group. Other significant ethnic groups include the Madurese, who hail from Madura, off the northeast coast of Java, and make up 8 percent of the population; and the ethnic Malay, who are dispersed throughout several areas, and make up 7 percent of the population. Among the ethnic groups on Sumatra are the Bataks, who cluster around Lake Toba; the Minangkabau, from the western highlands; the Acehnese, from the far north; and the Lampungese, who live in the south. On Sulawesi, the Minahasans live in the north, the Bugis and Makassarese cluster around the coasts in the south, and the Toraja inhabit much of the interior. Kalimantan is populated by more than 200 groups; most of these are tribes of the Dayak ethnic group in the interior or are ethnic Malay living on the coast. The people of Papua are of Melanesian descent, as are some residents from smaller eastern islands. Several million Indonesians of Chinese descent are concentrated in urban areas. Smaller numbers of Indians, Arabs, and Europeans are scattered around the archipelago.

Ethnic tensions simmer in Indonesia. The movement of many Javanese to Papua under the transmigration program has created tensions with native residents there. Many Indonesians have also come into conflict with residents of Chinese origin, who have been historically successful in business ventures and generally enjoy a higher standard of living than Indonesians of Malay descent. Frustration over the actual or perceived wealth of the Chinese has led to riots in towns and cities on Java and other parts of Indonesia, particularly in 1997 and 1998 when the Chinese were blamed for Indonesia’s economic problems. Many Chinese Indonesians fled the country at that time. [/color]
--




-Chris
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #170
Hitssquad, it still doesn't narrow it down to a particular race, as you have shown, these countries have a mix of races. They are only tracking the broader "ethnic" background.
 
  • #171
Some people cling as tightly to racism as they do their skin.
 
  • #172


Originally posted by Nereid
Relevant publications; from the Australian 2001 Census, and prior to the http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/Classifications/ns_ethnic_classification.asp .

The question asked in the Australian Census was: "What is [your] ancestry?" And the choices were:
- English
- Irish
- Italian
- German
- Greek
- Chinese
- Australian
- Other (please specify)
Instructions: "When answering this question consider and mark the ancestries with which you most closely identify. Count your ancestry back as far as three generations, if known. For example, consider your parents, grandparents and great grandparents."
The Australian Census 2001 appears to use the word ancestry to mean race. In Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary 3.0, the second sense of the seventh entry for race uses the word ancestor:


--
2 a : the descendants of a common ancestor : a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock <the impoverished scion of a noble race> [/color]
--




I haven't yet found the UK question and instructions. However, the categories are interesting: there are two groups, "National" and "Ethnic". The former:
- English
- Scottish
- Welsh
- Irish
- British
- Other
- Not Stated.

Ethnic groups had two tiers; the top tier:
- White
- Mixed
- Asian or Asian British
- Black or Black British
- Chinese or Other Ethnic Group.
Here, the U.K. seems to be using the word ethnic in its racial sense. Providing further indication that the word ethnic can legitimately be used to mean race, the Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary 3.0 can be observed to use the word race in that dictionary's first sense of the word ethnology:


--
Main Entry: eth-nol-o-gy
Pronunciation: -j\bar{e}, -ji
Function: noun
Inflected Form: -es
Etymology: ethno- + -logy

1 : a science that deals with the division of mankind into races, with their origin, distribution, and relations, and with the peculiarities that characterize them[/color]
--




Even further, the U.K. Office for National Statistics http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/Classifications/ns_ethnic_classification.asp to pursuing the question of ancestry (race):


--
The National Statistician also sees a clear need for research to further enhance the National Statistics understanding of and approach to classifying ethnicity and related concepts... This work ... should explore the inter-play between concepts such as ... ancestry, etc.[/color]
--




-Chris
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #173
The Indian Census did not ask questions of 'race', ancestry, ethnicity, etc (except for "Scheduled Caste" and "Scheduled Tribe" - more "British" than the English?).

The http://www.statcan.ca/english/census2001/pdf/infoquest.pdf is very interesting:
Q17 (my emphasis): "To which ethnic or cultural group(s) did [your] ancestors belong? For example, Canadian, French, English, Chinese, Italian, German, Scottish, Irish, Cree, Micmac, Métis, Inuit (Eskimo), East Indian, Ukrainian, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Filipino, Jewish, Greek, Jamaican, Vietnamese, Lebanese, Chilean, Somali, etc. specify as many groups as applicable"

Q18: Are you "an Aboriginal person, that is, North American Indian, Métis or Inuit (Eskimo)?"

Q19: Are you "(mark more than one, or specify, if applicable)
White
Chinese
South Asian (e.g. East Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, etc)
Black
Filipino
Latin American
Southeast Asian (e.g. Cambodian, Indonesian, Laotian, Vietnamese, etc)
Arab
West Asian (e.g. Afghan, Iranian, etc)
Japanese
Korean
Other"

And then there's the US ...

In addition to 'race', the US Census asks about Hispanic/Latino (etc). AFAIcantell, this has to more to do with speaking Spanish (or having parents who speak/spoke Spanish) than anything else. Of course, a great many "Hispanics" undoubtedly come from countries to the south of the US (including Brazil, tho' Portuguese is the national language there :wink:) - or their forebears did - and some can trace their ancestry to some Spanish invaders.

It would seem that a government's measures of the demographic categories of the residents in the territories it governs have a great deal to do with how those residents perceive themselves, the ethnic groups to which they feel they belong, the countries which they (or their parents) came from, and (to a lesser extent) the ancestors they like to acknowledge. These categories have but a tenuous relationship to 'race'.

[Edit: corrected typos]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #174
One thing I rather like about the Australian approach* is the implicit acknowledgment of direct relevance. Most of us know (or knew) our parents, ditto our grandparents; many of us are lucky enough to have known (or know) our great grandparents; few of us are so lucky to have known our great, great grandparents.
hitssquad: The Australian Census 2001 appears to use the word ancestry to mean race. In Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary 3.0, the second sense of the seventh entry for race uses the word ancestor
Thanks for that hitssquad. Did you know that the Australians have a perfectly good dictionary of their own brand of English?

I'll leave it to Adam to tell us if Australians mean 'race' whenever they use the term 'ancestry'.

In the meantime, I simply note that one need only have grandparents born in Australia to (logically) mark "Australian", and that those ancestors didn't need to have come with the First Fleet to have been born in Wollongong (or Dapto :wink:).

*"... consider [...] the ancestries with which you most closely identify. Count your ancestry back as far as three generations, if known. For example, consider your parents, grandparents and great grandparents.[/color]"
 
  • #175
Originally posted by Nereid


*"... consider [...] the ancestries with which you most closely identify. Count your ancestry back as far as three generations, if known. For example, consider your parents, grandparents and great grandparents.[/color]"
In that situation, what you are saying is that "race" by nearly any definition, is meaningless? Oh no, what will the racists do now?
 
  • #176
hitssquad: Here, the U.K. seems to be using the word ethnic in its racial sense. Providing further indication that the word ethnic can legitimately be used to mean race, the Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary 3.0 can be observed to use the word race in that dictionary's first sense of the word ethnology
Our friends across the pond (or in the antipodes, depends on your POV), also have their own dictionary of the language they speak (I think they call it 'English'). Perhaps one of our many PF members could enlighten us as to whether they *really* mean 'race' every time they use the words 'ethnic group'.
 
  • #177


Originally posted by hitssquad
One might suppose that the government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands would differentiate between Turkish Turks and Kurdish Turks to the point that the CIA's listing of ethnic Turks consists only of Ethnic Turks and not of Kurdish Turks.
People immigrate each year, the government keeps track which countries people are immigrating from. If people immigrate from Belgium, should they be asked whether they are from the French or Dutch part? If people immigrate from the UK, should they be asked whether they are Welsh or not? No, they come from either the Belgian or the UK rule.

In the US when I applied for a social security card, I had to give my ethnicity -caucasian-. I've never ever been asked or have ever heard of that question here.
 
  • #178
hitssquad: Indonesia may appear similarly mixed at first glance, but the apparent mixture might be reduceable to mainly a relatively homogenous Malay population and a relatively homogenous Han Chinese population, as the Microsoft Encarta 2002 entry for Indonesia migt seem to suggest:
Indonesia has ~6,000 inhabited islands, a population only a little smaller than that of the US, and a long and rich history. Surely at least as a challenge to understand as the US.

How many years have you lived there hitssquad?
 
  • #179
The racial profile of Indonesia

Originally posted by Nereid
hitssquad:
Indonesia may appear similarly mixed at first glance, but the apparent mixture might be reduceable to mainly a relatively homogenous Malay population and a relatively homogenous Han Chinese population, as the Microsoft Encarta 2002 entry for Indonesia migt seem to suggest:
Indonesia has ~6,000 inhabited islands, a population only a little smaller than that of the US, and a long and rich history. Surely at least as a challenge to understand as the US.
--
Although the islands are home to more than 100 ethnic groups, most Indonesians are of mixed Malay origins... [/color]
--
Microsoft® Encarta® Encyclopedia 2002. Entry: Indonesia.




-Chris
 
  • #180
Originally posted by NateTG
So there's a problem because professional sports are dominated by people between 15 and 35, and it's legal discrimination that infants are not allowed to drive, and that there is an age of consent at all?

Why not throw beauty on that list while you're at it? Beautiful people typically have an easier time in life, getting jobs and so on.

While it's easy to point at a disparity in our society, and claim that that disparity is a problem, it's not always as easy to show what the root cause of the problem.

For example, I can claim it's a problem that there is a disproportionate underrepresentation of blind people with driver's licences which indicates that the DMV discriminates against blind people. While this is obviously a straw man, it illustrates that there is a need to distinguish between reasonable and unreasonable discrimination at some level.

I'm not claiming that there is necessarily a correlation between 'race' and performance, or that such correlation, if it exists, is not purely the result of social discrimination, but if that type of correlation exists, then some level of 'racial' discrimination is reasonable.

Even if there is reasonable justification for racial discrimination, it does not demonstrate that there is not a social or political race-related problem that should be discussed or adressed.

This, of course, leads to a reason to 'cling' to racism - pragmatism. For many notions of race, it is easy to observe, and if race has reasonable performance predicting value, racial discrimination can be beneficial.

Similarly, a 'white' person in a predominantly 'black' neighborhood, a latino person in a predominantly 'asian' neighborhood or anyone else whose 'race' makes them stand out is likely to be an outsider, and will consequently receive different treatment than people who are perceived to be locals.

For things like 'police profiling' the question is usually not whether race is a factor in decisionmaking, but whether race affects decisionmaking disproportionately with its predictive value.

whoa, hold on! i think you took my words a little too far...

when i was referring to these various things, i should have put something to the effect of using common sense when "picking and choosing"...common sense would obviously rule out an infant being allowed to drive, the elderly wanting to be allowed to play in the NFL etc...this is where ability comes into play, which is an individual basis over something such as color, age, and gender-which is obviously beyond our individual control...

and what's this about beautiful people having it easier in life? can i also say that beautful women have a better chance of getting raped too because they are typically more desirable? i think this statement results from your opinion rather then common sense and true facts...

i certainly did not mean to imply that everything should be open to everyone otherwise it's considered discrimination...common sense and ground rules for particular activities are in play for a reason.
 
  • #181
Originally posted by Kerrie
i certainly did not mean to imply that everything should be open to everyone otherwise it's considered discrimination common sense and ground rules for particular activities are in play for a reason.

Right, but as soon as it starts being a question of where to draw the line, instead of whether to draw the line, it's not nearly as simple.
 
  • #182
What do you call those transparent beings? They are people of no colour?

I've tried copulating with them but my genes instinctively stopped any co-mingling of genetic material. That brought to mind that there might be a genetic barrier separating certain combinations of the various ethnic groups.

It is most likely a psychological barrier, mind you.
 
Back
Top