Why Do Photons and Gravitons Have Classical Counterparts in QFT?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
5 replies · 2K views
karlzr
Messages
129
Reaction score
2
In QFT, all particles can be interpreted as excitations of some fundamental quantum fields in the vacuum. This is the quantum picture. But in classical world, only photons and gravitons have classical counterparts. How to explain this? The common feature of these two is that they are intermediate particles of long-range interactions. But This is far from satisfactory to me. So I was wondering whether there is a deeper and better explanation of this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Roughly speaking, quantum fields look like classical waves when there are many particles in the same state. So classical electromagnetic waves are states of many photons and classical gravitational waves are states of many gravitons.

Fermion fields don't have any states that look classical, because you cannot put more than one fermion in the same state. So there is no classical analog of the electron field.

The W, Z, and Higgs fields are bosonic but they never look classical because these bosons all decay long before you could hope to construct a state containing lots of them. (This is pretty much the same thing as saying that they don't mediate long-range interactions.)

The gluon field undergoes confinement and so there aren't actually any states that look like gluons, let alone states with many coherent gluons. There are only hadrons and glueballs.
 
The_Duck said:
Roughly speaking, quantum fields look like classical waves when there are many particles in the same state. So classical electromagnetic waves are states of many photons and classical gravitational waves are states of many gravitons.

For the static electric field around an electric charge, how to understand it from the perspective of quantum fields? In the absence of test particle, I guess there is no photons except vacuum bubble. So can we say there is no electric field unless a test particle is placed nearby to have virtual photon exchange?

Meir Achuz said:
What do you mean by this? What is "classical" about photons and gravitons?
Of course we don't have quanta in classical world. I mean the classical wave or field: EM field or radiation, gravitational field or gravitational wave.
 
karlzr said:
For the static electric field around an electric charge, how to understand it from the perspective of quantum fields?

In covariant QED the static Coulomb field is mediated by the scalar and longitudinal photons which exist even in vacuum (where no transverse photons are present).
 
WannabeNewton said:
In covariant QED the static Coulomb field is mediated by the scalar and longitudinal photons which exist even in vacuum (where no transverse photons are present).

Doesn't the scalar mode always cancel out the longitudinal mode?
If there is no test particle, where do the scalar and longitudinal modes end?