Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around understanding why signals with finite energy have zero average power, focusing on the concepts of average power and energy signals versus power signals. Participants seek physical intuition and clarification on these definitions and their implications.
Discussion Character
- Conceptual clarification
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses difficulty in grasping the intuition behind finite energy signals having zero average power and requests a physical explanation.
- Another participant mentions confusion specifically regarding the concept of average power.
- A participant explains that a periodic signal, such as g(t) = sin(t), averages to zero over time due to its oscillation between positive and negative values, suggesting that the average of g(t) alone is not useful.
- This participant proposes that the average of g(t)^2 is taken to define power signals, which avoids cancellation of negative values and provides a meaningful average.
- Using sin(t) as an example, the participant calculates that the average power is 1/2, leading to a root mean square (RMS) value of 0.707.
- Another participant reiterates the distinction between energy signals, which approach zero as time goes to infinity, and power signals, which do not, indicating that energy signals have undefined power and vice versa.
- A participant expresses gratitude for the explanations and notes that some insights provided are not found in textbooks, indicating a desire for further clarification on the term "not defined."
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the intuitive understanding of average power and its relationship to finite energy signals. Multiple viewpoints and explanations are presented without resolution.
Contextual Notes
Participants discuss the definitions and implications of average power and energy signals, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the mathematical treatment of these concepts and their physical interpretations.