Why do signals with finite energy have 0 average power?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding why signals with finite energy have zero average power, focusing on the concepts of average power and energy signals versus power signals. Participants seek physical intuition and clarification on these definitions and their implications.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in grasping the intuition behind finite energy signals having zero average power and requests a physical explanation.
  • Another participant mentions confusion specifically regarding the concept of average power.
  • A participant explains that a periodic signal, such as g(t) = sin(t), averages to zero over time due to its oscillation between positive and negative values, suggesting that the average of g(t) alone is not useful.
  • This participant proposes that the average of g(t)^2 is taken to define power signals, which avoids cancellation of negative values and provides a meaningful average.
  • Using sin(t) as an example, the participant calculates that the average power is 1/2, leading to a root mean square (RMS) value of 0.707.
  • Another participant reiterates the distinction between energy signals, which approach zero as time goes to infinity, and power signals, which do not, indicating that energy signals have undefined power and vice versa.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the explanations and notes that some insights provided are not found in textbooks, indicating a desire for further clarification on the term "not defined."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the intuitive understanding of average power and its relationship to finite energy signals. Multiple viewpoints and explanations are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the definitions and implications of average power and energy signals, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the mathematical treatment of these concepts and their physical interpretations.

Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2
Hello PF,


I have trouble understanding these 2 types of signals. I mean definition is clear, math is also mostly clear, but intuition isn't.

Can somebody explain to me, why signals that have finite energy have 0 average power. Physical explanation if you may.

I learned that average power in AC circuits is power dissipated in Joule heating, but I cannot relate that to signals.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To add: I have trouble understanding the concept of average power.
 
A periodic signal repeats itself every period: g(t+ T0) = g(t).

In a sinusoid for example, g(t) = sin(t), intuitively you can say that in one period, half the time g(t) varies from 0 to 1, and half the time g(t) varies from 0 to -1. In other words, g(t) varies from 1 to -1 in one period. And since g(t) is periodic, you can observe that on average g(t) is zero over the whole time interval. This kind of leads to the notion that the average of just the g(t) is not useful.

So instead, we take the average of g(t)^2 (definition of a power signal). This makes any negative value of g(t) positive as to avoid any cancellation with positive value of g(t).

If we take g(t) = sin(t), then g(t)^2 = sin(x)^2

To the get intuitive feel for it, we notice that sin(x)^2 fluctuates evenly between 0 and 1 in one period. So on average sin(x)^2 is (0+1)/2 = 1/2. It means that the function spends most of the time around 1/2.

Hence, the power{sin(t)} = 1/2 (average of sin(t)^2 per period). To obtain the average of a sin(t) from the power, take the square root of power{sin(t)}= 1/sqrt(2) = 0.707 (root mean square or RMS).

If that kind of made sense, an energy signal is defined to approach zero as time goes to infinity. Something like f(t)= e^-t is an energy signal, which is not periodic, so its power is not defined. And likewise, a power signal doesn't approach zero as time goes to infinity, so its energy is not defined.
 
Last edited:
what said:
A periodic signal repeats itself every period: g(t+ T0) = g(t).

In a sinusoid for example, g(t) = sin(t), intuitively you can say that in one period, half the time g(t) varies from 0 to 1, and half the time g(t) varies from 0 to -1. In other words, g(t) varies from 1 to -1 in one period. And since g(t) is periodic, you can observe that on average g(t) is zero over the whole time interval. This kind of leads to the notion that the average of just the g(t) is not useful.

So instead, we take the average of g(t)^2 (definition of a power signal). This makes any negative value of g(t) positive as to avoid any cancellation with positive value of g(t).

If we take g(t) = sin(t), then g(t)^2 = sin(x)^2

To the get intuitive feel for it, we notice that sin(x)^2 fluctuates evenly between 0 and 1 in one period. So on average sin(x)^2 is (0+1)/2 = 1/2. It means that the function spends most of the time around 1/2.

Hence, the power{sin(t)} = 1/2 (average of sin(t)^2 per period). To obtain the average of a sin(t) from the power, take the square root of power{sin(t)}= 1/sqrt(2) = 0.707 (root mean square or RMS).

If that kind of made sense, an energy signal is defined to approach zero as time goes to infinity. Something like f(t)= e^-t is an energy signal, which is not periodic, so its power is not defined. And likewise, a power signal doesn't approach zero as time goes to infinity, so its energy is not defined.

Thank you for your in depth reply. I think I understand what you stated in your post. In any case you gave me a lot of things to work with in order to understand. Some tricks that you showed me are not in textbooks. I appreciate that very much.

One more thing tho, do you by not defined, mean infinity?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K