I Why do some mesons have = sign while others have ≈ in their composition?

Click For Summary
The use of the equal sign for mesons like the ρ^0 indicates a precise composition, while the approximate sign for the ω meson reflects its slight mixing with strange quark-antiquark pairs. The ω and ϕ mesons result from the mixing of two SU(3) wave functions, which include contributions from different quark flavors. The mixing angle affects their composition, leading to the approximation in the ω meson's representation. This distinction is crucial for understanding the properties and interactions of these mesons in particle physics.
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I am reading Modern Particle Physics by Mark Thomson and in chapter 9.6.2 he writes the composition of certain mesons. However for some of them he uses an equality sign: $$|\rho^0> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\bar{u}-d\bar{d})$$ while for others he writes: $$|\omega> \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d})$$ I see that on wikipedia the omega meson appears simply as $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d})$$ so I was wondering what is the meaning of not using an equal sign for certain mesons' composition. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ≈ is used because the ω has a tiny bit of ss̅

The ω and ϕ arise from mixing of two SU(3) wave functions:

$$\phi = \psi_8 \cos\theta - \psi_1 \sin\theta$$
$$\omega = \psi_8 \sin\theta + \psi_1 \cos\theta$$
where
$$\psi_8 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(u\overline{u} - d\overline{d} - 2s\overline{s})$$
$$\psi_1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(u\overline{u} + d\overline{d} + s\overline{s})$$

The mixing angle θ just happens to be such that

$$\phi \approx s\overline{s}$$
$$\omega \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(u\overline{u}+d\overline{d})$$
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K