Why Do Some Odd Numbers Fail to Be Prime?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vroman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of statements related to motion, acceleration, and the nature of odd numbers in relation to primality. Participants are examining the clarity and ambiguity of true/false questions posed in a homework context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity and clarity of true/false statements regarding motion and acceleration. They express concerns about the ambiguity of certain questions and the implications of the terms used. There is also a discussion about the logical interpretation of statements regarding odd numbers and their relationship to being prime.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the clarity of the questions, suggesting that the inclusion of specific terms could improve understanding. Others have raised concerns about the conventions used in true/false questions and their potential to confuse students. The conversation is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the phrasing of questions may lead to misunderstandings, particularly when critical qualifiers are omitted. There is a shared sentiment that the questions could be misleading without proper context or definitions.

vroman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
For some reason, my answers to these questions are wrong, but I don't understand which ones and why, please help:

A)The speed of an accelerated body changes with time...False
B)THe velocity of an accelerated body changes with time...True
C)The words motion and acceleration can be used interchangeably...False
D)The position of a body in motion changes with time...False
E)The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero...False
F)Motion and acceleration are not the same quantity...True
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vroman,

They're all right except one. That should help! :wink:
 
Thanks, I figured it out!
 
vroman said:
For some reason, my answers to these questions are wrong, but I don't understand which ones and why, please help:

A)The speed of an accelerated body changes with time...False
B)THe velocity of an accelerated body changes with time...True
C)The words motion and acceleration can be used interchangeably...False
D)The position of a body in motion changes with time...False
E)The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero...False
F)Motion and acceleration are not the same quantity...True

I'm sorry to be a stickler here, but which teacher would set such dumb, ambiguous questions for students ?


My answers would be different for A and E :

A)The speed of an accelerated body changes with time... Not necessarily, but unable to determine if true or false from just this.

E)The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero...Again, not necessarily, but unable to determine if true or false from just this

If the questions had included the critical word necessarily then they would be OK, but as they stand, I consider them inadequate and misleading.
 
Curious3141 said:
If the questions had included the critical word necessarily then they would be OK, but as they stand, I consider them inadequate and misleading.

When an answer of "true" or "false" is asked for, true means "always true" and "false" means "not always true".
 
jdavel said:
When an answer of "true" or "false" is asked for, true means "always true" and "false" means "not always true".

yah, "is" always denotes "true = always true"
 
jdavel said:
When an answer of "true" or "false" is asked for, true means "always true" and "false" means "not always true".

Hmmph, where did such an idiotic convention come from, and are the students taught to assume this by default ? No wonder most of them do so poorly at formal logic, they're not even taught the correct meanings of false and true ! :smile:

It's all well and good to have this sort of convention for binary dichotomous choices. But I've seen more "complex" truth type questions, where there are choices for T, F, Insufficient info. If faced with a three pronged choice like that, I'd go for the third one, but it can be confusing if students have been taught all along that T = always, necessarily true and F = not always true, but not necessarily false either.
 
Curious,

Is the statement "Odd numbers are prime numbers" true, false, or is there "insufficient info" to say one way or the other?

I see no difference (logically) between that statement and the statement "The acceleration of a body with zero speed is zero."
 
jdavel said:
Curious,

Is the statement "Odd numbers are prime numbers" true, false, or is there "insufficient info" to say one way or the other?

I would consider the above statement to be ambiguous. I understand that the intended implication is that a general odd number is necessarily a prime (which of course is FALSE), but it is still possible for confusion with the alternative implication that certain specific odds can be prime (which is TRUE). I would be comfortable with this sort of statement in a conversation, where clarification can always be sought, but not in a textbook, and certainly not in a graded test.

Maybe it's just me, but I expect strict logical clarity in my test questions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K