Undergrad Why Do Some Theorists Claim Cosmic Inflation Dilutes Magnetic Monopoles?

Click For Summary
Maxwell's Equations indicate that magnetic monopoles are not observed, but some theorists argue that cosmic inflation could dilute their presence. The discussion highlights that magnetic monopoles, if they exist, are not simple particles but rather topological defects from early Universe phase transitions. The Dirac quantization condition suggests a theoretical framework for their existence. The distinction between the equations governing magnetic fields raises questions about the conditions under which monopoles might be detected. Overall, the debate centers on the implications of cosmic inflation for the existence and visibility of magnetic monopoles in the universe.
GaloisGroup
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Why would non-existent monopoles be "diluted" by cosmic inflation?
So if Maxwell's Equations state that Div B = 0 which is a statement that there are no magnetic monopoles why do some folks claim that Cosmic Inflation "dilutes" magnetic monopoles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\nabla\cdot\vec B=0## is a statement that we don't see magnetic monopoles, not a proof that there are none.

A reason why we don't see any (either they exist, but are super rare, or they don't exist at all) would be nice.
 
The magnetic monopoles that are considered in cosmology are not point particles. They are topological defects resulting from phase transitions in the early Universe, typically in grand unified theories.
 
I am fascinated by the Dirac quantization condition that pertains to the existance of a single magnetic monopole.
 
The equation $$ \vec \nabla \cdot \vec B = 0 $$ rules out the existence of magnetic monopoles but there is another equation $$ \vec \nabla \cdot \vec B = \mu _ 0 \rho _ m $$ which includes the existence of magnetic monopoles.
 
GaloisGroup said:
why do some folks claim that ….?
Do you have a particular instance of this claim? It’s hard to have a sensible discussion without that.
 
I'm working through something and want to make sure I understand the physics. In a system with three wave components at 120° phase separation, the total energy calculation depends on how we treat them: If coherent (add amplitudes first, then square): E = (A₁ + A₂ + A₃)² = 0 If independent (square each, then add): E = A₁² + A₂² + A₃² = 3/2 = constant In three-phase electrical systems, we treat the phases as independent — total power is sum of individual powers. In light interference...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K