Why Do Textbooks Use Different Signs in Gauge Covariant Derivative Notations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter captain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Gauge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the differing notations for the gauge covariant derivative, specifically D_u=d_u-ieA_u versus D_u=d_u+ieA_u. This discrepancy is attributed to conventions in defining the relationship between "e" and the electric charge of the electron. Ultimately, the choice of notation is a matter of convenience and does not affect the underlying physics. Understanding this convention is essential for interpreting various textbooks on the subject.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with gauge theory concepts
  • Understanding of covariant derivatives in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of electromagnetism and electric charge
  • Experience with mathematical notation in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of gauge invariance in quantum field theory
  • Study the mathematical formulation of covariant derivatives
  • Explore different conventions in theoretical physics literature
  • Examine the role of electric charge in gauge theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone studying gauge theories and their mathematical formulations.

captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
I was wonder why some textbooks define it as D_u=d_u-ieA_u and other textbooks define it as D_u=d_u+ieA_u. I am not clear whether this choice doesn't matter or is one notation correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not relevant, it"s simply a matter of convention and convenience. It has to do with the connection between "e" and the value of the electric charge of the electron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K