A Why Do We Need Alchemical Methods to Compute Gibbs Energy Changes?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter MichaelWiteman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Gibbs
MichaelWiteman
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi,

To compute, for example, the Gibbs energy change for a ligand binding to a protein, various so called alchemical methods are used in molecular dynamics simulations. My question is why can't we just obtain averaged Gibbs energies for 1) the free ligand and protein in the same water box, and 2) the protein-ligand complex in the water box and then subtract? Both cases will have the same amount and type of atoms and the simulation would be conducted at the same temperature, density etc. I know this is a naive question but understanding the reasons why this is not done will help me understand a few things.

Thanks!

--Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you will be missing all entropic contribution. Your suggestions can account for the energy but not for the free energy.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top