Fiona Rozario
- 52
- 1
Why not work with the complete signal, instead of breaking it into in-phase and quadrature components?
The discussion revolves around the necessity of using in-phase and quadrature components of a signal, exploring the reasons for breaking down signals rather than working with them in their complete form. The scope includes theoretical considerations and practical applications in signal processing.
Participants express differing views on whether it is necessary to break signals into in-phase and quadrature components, with some supporting the practice for specific applications while others advocate for working with the complete signal. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity and advantages of each approach.
Some limitations include the dependence on the user's familiarity with frequency domain processes and the potential complexity involved in understanding these concepts in both time and frequency domains.
Thank you...DaleSpam said:Usually that is done because you want to work with a lower frequency version of the signal. Either demodulated to baseband or to some Intermediate frequency.
Thank you...sophiecentaur said:It is quite possible to deal with the signal as it comes - a variation of Voltage with time. Some processes are just easier to accomplish in the frequency domain and using complex numbers. When I say "easier", that assumes that your a familiar with that stuff. If you aren't then those processes could be pretty hard to comprehend in either time or frequency domains. It gets difficult pretty rapidly.
I guess a simple answer is that quadrature components of a signal; are orthogonal to each other and the components can be treated separately and independently. You could, for example, get two AM signals transmitted together on quadrature carriers and then recover them separately. But you would need to keep the quadrature relationship going throughout the process.