Why do we need upper and lower limits in definite integration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter san203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of upper and lower limits in definite integration, exploring its relationship with differentiation and the implications in physics. Participants examine the conceptual underpinnings of definite and indefinite integrals, as well as their applications in understanding motion and change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why both upper and lower limits are needed in definite integration, relating it to the concept of differentiation where a single value can yield an instantaneous rate of change.
  • Another participant explains that definite integration involves summing over an interval, necessitating limits to define the range of integration.
  • Some participants clarify that while derivatives are associated with instantaneous values, integrals represent accumulated quantities, which require bounds to define the area under a curve.
  • There is a discussion on the relationship between differentiation and integration, with some suggesting that definite integration can be viewed as associating a value to a function over an interval, contrasting with differentiation's focus on a point.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding the interpretation of differentials, questioning whether they represent changes or infinitesimal quantities, indicating a lack of clarity on this aspect.
  • Another participant inquires about the relevance of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in physics, particularly in relation to the equation ds/dt = V, suggesting that the area under the curve may not directly invoke the theorem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations of the relationship between definite and indefinite integrals, as well as the role of limits in integration. There is no clear consensus on the necessity of both limits or the interpretation of differentials, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for bounds in integrals to define areas, while others focus on the conceptual differences between points and intervals in calculus. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and its application in physics.

san203
Gold Member
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
My question is that why is their a need for both upper and lower while calculating Definite Integrals.

The question arose when i thought of Definite integration as something related to Differentiation. Or is it that only Indefinite Integration is directly related to differentiation.

In differentiation, we get the slope or rate of change.

So if i differentiate s(displacement) w.r.t. t(time), i get ds/dt = v(Velocity). By putting just one value of t, i get a value of velocity at that instant.

But to get back that one value of s(displacement), why do we need two values of t(time)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integration is obviously related to differentiation, both definite and indefinite ones. However, the inverse of differentiation is indefinite integration. Definite integration is an infinite sum of infinitely small things that just so happens to be computed using antiderivatives, see the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. We need limits to determine over what interval we are going to perform the sum on.
 
What, exactly, is your understanding of the derivative and integral? Most texts introduce the derivative as "slope" of the curve (actually slope of the tangent line) at a given point, integral as area under a curve. "At a given point" is necessarily a single value of x while "area" has to have bounds- the curve as upper bound, y= 0 as lower bound, and two x values as left and right bounds.

In Physics, we can think of the derivative (of the distance function) as the speed at a given instant- one value of t. The derivative of the velocity function is the increase in distance. Increase over what time interval. We have to have a "beginning" time as well as a final time in order to talk about an increase.
 
Of course definite integration is something related to differentiation.
$$\mathop{f}(b)-\mathop{f}(a)=\int_a^b \! {\mathop{f} }^ \prime (x) \, \mathop{dx}$$
I would not focus on the number of values it is not a central idea.
Traditionally integration is introduced as associating a value to a function and interval and differentiation associates value to a point and function. These are mostly the same as we can think of a point as a small interval and we can think of an interval as a point.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What, exactly, is your understanding of the derivative and integral? Most texts introduce the derivative as "slope" of the curve (actually slope of the tangent line) at a given point, integral as area under a curve. "At a given point" is necessarily a single value of x while "area" has to have bounds- the curve as upper bound, y= 0 as lower bound, and two x values as left and right bounds.

My understanding of the topic is what is mentioned by you and other in this thread.
Differentiation is the process of finding the derivative. Derivative being nothing but the instantaneous (limit x->0) rate of change of y(function of x) w.r.t. x By this we see that derivative is slope of tangent to the curve at the point in consideration.

Indefinite integration is the inverse of differentiation. Definite Integration is the process of finding area under the curve as the area corresponds to the product of the Slope and the independent variable which helps us find the change in The dependent variable( Am i right?)

HallsofIvy said:
In Physics, we can think of the derivative (of the distance function) as the speed at a given instant- one value of t. The derivative of the velocity function is the increase in distance. Increase over what time interval. We have to have a "beginning" time as well as a final time in order to talk about an increase.

Nice. Exactly what i wanted.
Edit : sorry but i think you meant the integration of velocity function as increase in distance?

One more thing. Sometimes d(any variable here) is a change like in dv(velocity) and sometimes it is the just infinitesimally small quantity like dW. Sometimes i feel both are the same and sometimes i dont. Which one is true?
 
Last edited:
Also can you tell me why Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is Useful in Physics.
I mean if we take the example of ds/dt= V , then we can say that ds = V.dt which indicates that the area of the product of V and dt gives us a number which is equal to the small change is s all from the equation. I don't think i used any F.T.C here , so why is it considered so important atleast in this case?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K