Why do we subtract and not divide when solving for variables in algebra?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the algebraic manipulation of equations, specifically why subtraction is used instead of division when isolating a variable. Participants explore the reasoning behind these operations in the context of the equation s=vt+1/2at^2, focusing on the steps to solve for the variable v.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that subtraction is used to remove the entire term from one side of the equation to isolate the variable, as seen in the example s=vt+1/2at^2.
  • Others argue that dividing by a term does not effectively isolate the variable, as it can lead to a more complex expression that still contains the variable.
  • A participant mentions the importance of understanding terms in algebra, noting that terms are separated by addition or subtraction, which influences the choice of operation.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of dividing by zero, emphasizing the need to ensure that any variable or term used in division is not zero.
  • Some participants reflect on their own learning experiences and how understanding the concept of terms has clarified their approach to solving equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of isolating the variable and the necessity of performing the same operation on both sides of the equation. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to take when manipulating the equation, as different viewpoints on the use of subtraction versus division are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with algebraic concepts, and some mention potential confusion regarding the definitions of terms and operations. The discussion does not resolve the disagreement on the preferred method of manipulation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning algebra, educators seeking to understand common misconceptions, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of algebraic manipulation.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,205
Reaction score
7,687
Say we have an equation that we need to find a variable for. How about s=vt+1/2at^2, and we want to solve for v. How do you know what operation to do when you move variables around? My book says to subtract both sides by (at^2)/2 first. Why do you subtract the at^2 instead of divide?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I like to think about it in terms of taking everything away from the right hand side so all that is left is the v. "vt+1/2at^2" is essentially saying:

  1. First multiply v by t
  2. Then add the quantity 0.5at^2

So the first step in "isolating" the v is to reverse the last thing that happened i.e. subtract 0.5at^2 from both sides to get rid of the 0.5at^2 on the right hand side.

It may not be of much help to you, but that is how I thought about it when I started algebra.

I guess another way to think about it is to try division, and see why it won't work. If you instead divide both sides by 0.5at^2 you get:

\frac{s}{0.5at^2} = \frac{vt+0.5at^2}{0.5at^2}

Or, after simplifying:

\frac{s}{0.5at^2} = \frac{v}{0.5at}+1

It hasn't really helped!
 
Drakkith said:
Say we have an equation that we need to find a variable for. How about s=vt+1/2at^2, and we want to solve for v. How do you know what operation to do when you move variables around? My book says to subtract both sides by (at^2)/2 first. Why do you subtract the at^2 instead of divide?

Hey Drakkith.

I'm assuming you have values for the other variables.

The basic goal of solving for an unknown variable is get the variable in an explicit form. In other words if our variable we want to find is v, we want to get our variable in the form v = blah: this is called the explicit form.

If we can't get our value in v = blah where blah is everything else but v which is known, then you will get what is called an implicit equation where you might end up with something like av^2 + v + 2 = 0 or SQRT(v) + v^2 - v = 0 where you then have to solve for v which means you will have to use what is called a root finding algorithm to get possible solutions for v.

Now since you have an explicit kind of equation, all you have to do is get v in terms of everything else. This requires you to do basic algebra.

With basic algebra the idea is simple: what you do to one side you must do to the other: that's all there is to it.

So if you wanted to get rid of the 1/2at^2 term on the RHS you need to subtract the term on the left side. This means that by doing this you get:

s - 1/2at^2 = vt.

The only thing you have to be careful about when doing this kind of thing is to make sure that when you divide both sides by something (including a variable and not just a constant), that the variable is not 0: if you do this you will get into some big problems.

Other than that you can apply basic algebra on variables in the same way that you do with known constant numbers.
 
Thanks guys, but I think I managed to answer my own question. Per here: http://www.algebra-class.com/equations-with-fractions.html, it says:
We need to discuss the word term.

In Algebra, each term within an equation is separated by a plus (+) sign, minus (-) sign or an equals sign (=). Variable or quantities that are multiplied or divided are considered the same term.

So, with s=vt+1/2at^2, the terms on the right side are vt and +1/2at^2, meaning I need to subtract the WHOLE term, not just part of it, and definitely not divide part of it. I honestly don't ever remember learning what a Term was, but it has been a while since I learned math.
 
Drakkith said:
Thanks guys, but I think I managed to answer my own question. Per here: http://www.algebra-class.com/equations-with-fractions.html, it says:


So, with s=vt+1/2at^2, the terms on the right side are vt and +1/2at^2, meaning I need to subtract the WHOLE term, not just part of it, and definitely not divide part of it. I honestly don't ever remember learning what a Term was, but it has been a while since I learned math.

You can subtract/add/multiply/divide whatever term you want (as long as you don't divide by zero if its variable (like t) or constant = 0) but the goal is to get your unknown into unknown = blah where blah doesn't have the unknown variable in it.

Once you realize this, you will get a 'gut feeling' of how to get the unknown = blah equation from the original equation you have been given.

But yeah basically the rule is whatever you do to one side, you have to do the exact same thing to the other side: no if's or but's.
 
chiro said:
You can subtract/add/multiply/divide whatever term you want (as long as you don't divide by zero if its variable (like t) or constant = 0) but the goal is to get your unknown into unknown = blah where blah doesn't have the unknown variable in it.

What? Why would I be able to do any operation I want? Did I misunderstand you?

But yeah basically the rule is whatever you do to one side, you have to do the exact same thing to the other side: no if's or but's.

Of course. I know that part, I was confused about why I had to subtract the at^2 instead of divide. Now that I know it's all one term it makes much more sense.
 
Drakkith said:
What? Why would I be able to do any operation I want? Did I misunderstand you?

That was just a general comment for algebra problems and not specifically for your problem that was posted: just a tip to help you for you future problems.

Again the important thing is that for algebraic equations, you can't divide by zero so you have to check that your variable that you are dividing by if you ever divide by that variable (or term: you can divide by a term that has many variables in it) is never zero: if it is zero then you can't do it: there is a whole other discussion on why but what it boils down to is that you get answers that 'don't make sense'.


Of course. I know that part, I was confused about why I had to subtract the at^2 instead of divide. Now that I know it's all one term it makes much more sense.[/QUOTE]

Well the goal is to get an expression in terms of v.

Basically you have an equation of s = vt + blah and in order to get vt in terms of something else you have to - blah from both sides giving you s - blah = vt.

If you divided blah on both sides you would instead get:

s/blah = vt/blah + 1 (assuming blah is not zero).

This has not separated blah from v which is what you are setting out to do.

So basically if you are trying to solve for something (its v in this case but it could be whatever), you want to try and get v by itself on one side for these kinds of problems. (Later if you pursue further math you'll find that you will get an equation in terms of v but don't worry about that right now).

Once you do a few of these kinds of problems you'll see why you have to do what you have to do and see why another operation is not going to help you solve the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
17K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K