High School Why do we use squared quantities in equations and formulae?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of squared quantities in mathematical equations, particularly in relation to velocity and distance. Participants explain that squared terms, such as v², are essential for capturing the magnitude of quantities without directional information. The conversation highlights the importance of defining functions, particularly the square root function, which is defined to yield non-negative results. Additionally, the discussion touches on the implications of using squared terms in algebra and the necessity of specifying domains for functions to maintain single-valuedness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic concepts, including functions and their definitions.
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation, particularly square roots and absolute values.
  • Knowledge of kinematics, specifically the relationships between velocity, acceleration, and distance.
  • Basic understanding of mathematical continuity and differentiability.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of absolute values and their definitions in mathematics.
  • Explore the implications of using squared quantities in physics, particularly in kinematics.
  • Learn about the concept of functions and their inverses, focusing on single-valuedness and domain restrictions.
  • Investigate the role of continuity in mathematical functions and its importance in calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, physicists, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of algebra and its applications in real-world scenarios.

  • #31
etotheipi said:
@sophiecentaur I really have a hard time understanding what you're trying to say. The fact that functions are single valued (by definition) is a critical property.
Strongly agree. In the example posted by @sophiecentaur, ##x^2 + y^2 = 1##, y is most definitely NOT a function of x. The same is true for the other conic sections. For the circle equation, solving for y yields ##y = \pm \sqrt{1 - x^2}##, so for each x, with ##x \ne \pm 1##, there are two y values.
sophiecentaur said:
Afaics, it's important to qualify statements about the 'meaning' of Root x.
No. Although a positive real number has two square roots, the symbol ##\sqrt x## is taken by convention to mean the principal, or positive square root. Why else do you think there's a +/- symbol in the Quadratic Formula; i.e., the solutions to ##ax^2 + bx + c = 0## are given by ##x = \frac{b^2 \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}##.
sophiecentaur said:
I think you mean a continuously differentiable function. There are plenty of functions with first derivatives that aren't continuous. Triangular waves, cycloids and x2 = y
No, he (@etotheipi) meant plain old functions. BTW, ##x^2 = y## is continuous and has derivatives of all orders. ##\frac{dy}{dx} = 2x##. OTOH, if you meant ##y^2 = x \Leftrightarrow y = \pm \sqrt x##, then y is not a function of x. (Each positive x value is paired with two y values.)
sophiecentaur said:
Perhaps the vocabulary has changed in 50 years. (Which is possible.)
No, it hasn't. From Calculus and Analytic Geometry, by Abraham Schwartz, 2nd Ed., published in 1967: (emphasis added by me)
Function; domain; range. We are given a set of numbers, which we shall call the domain D, and instructions for associating a number y with each number x of D. The set of all numbers y associated with numbers x of D shall be called the range R. The correspondence thus created between the sets D and R shall be called a function.
The relationship here is either a one-to-one relationship (e.g. y = f(x) = 2x) or many-to-one (e.g., y = g(x) = sin(x). By definition, a function cannot be one-to-many (e.g. ##y^2 = x## or equivalently ##y = \pm \sqrt x##).
The First Edition appeared in 1960, which is 60 years ago. I'm positive the definition of a function didn't change between the two editions.
sophiecentaur said:
"By definition" is too strong. You are stating that the default actually exists.
No, "by definition" is not too strong. One definition of the absolute value is ##|x| = \sqrt{x^2}##, for all real numbers x.

A.T. said:
How can "by definition" be too strong? It just a convention about what a word means in a certain context, that is most widely accepted.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, weirdoguy, etotheipi and 1 other person
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I do take all of your points and I clearly have mistaken how the word "function" is strictly defined. So the term is mi-used a lot? Perhaps and it wouldn't be the only commonly mis-used term.
 
  • #33
sophiecentaur said:
I do take all of your points and I clearly have mistaken how the word "function" is strictly defined. So the term is mi-used a lot? Perhaps and it wouldn't be the only commonly mis-used term.
Yes, it's misused a lot. A test that can be used to determine whether a graph represents a function is the vertical line test. If a vertical line is swept along the horizontal axis and never intersects more than one point, the graph is that of a function. This would show that the graph of a circle isn't that of a function, nor is the graph of the other conic sections, including, say, ##y^2 = x##.
Also, we have had many threads over the years where people are confused about the meaning of ##\sqrt x##, thinking that it represents two values.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #34
Mark44 said:
Also, we have had many threads over the years where people are confused about the meaning of ##\sqrt x##, thinking that it represents two values.
Ahh - and the 'quadratic solving formula' actually includes the term +/-√(4ac) to take care of that. It was hiding from me in plain sight!
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K