Why do we use negative signs for clockwise moments in torque calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mechanicstudy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of torque and the conventions used for determining the direction of moments, specifically addressing why clockwise moments are often considered negative in torque calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of torque from different forces and question the reasoning behind the use of negative signs for clockwise moments. There is a focus on understanding the significance of perpendicular distances in torque calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and explanations regarding the moments generated by different forces. Questions about the sign convention for clockwise moments are being actively discussed, with some guidance offered on standard conventions and the importance of distinguishing between clockwise and anticlockwise torques.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the inconsistency in their notes about when clockwise moments are considered negative, indicating a need for clarity on the standard conventions used in torque calculations.

mechanicstudy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on this problem at the moment.
X3t2W.jpg


The answer is 19.08 nm clockwise but i just don't see how it can be.

Check this.

2.8x(0.8+5.5)= 17.64 nm

If I use the 4.6 it ends up
4.6x(0.8+5.5) = 28.98 nm

I don't get how it can be 19.08 clockwise when there is only one force going clockwise or anticlockwise. That moment from that force isn't 19 though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The moment due to the 2.8 N force is (2.8)(5.5)= 15.4 Nm (The force is multiplied by the length of the arm perpendicular to the force). The moment due to the 4.6 N force is (4.6)(0.8)= 3.68 Nm for a total of 15.4+ 3.68= 19.08 Nm
 
HallsofIvy said:
The moment due to the 2.8 N force is (2.8)(5.5)= 15.4 Nm (The force is multiplied by the length of the arm perpendicular to the force). The moment due to the 4.6 N force is (4.6)(0.8)= 3.68 Nm for a total of 15.4+ 3.68= 19.08 Nm


I don't get how that would work. The 2.8 Force would have to go through 0.8m distance to get to point A.
 
mechanicstudy said:
I don't get how that would work. The 2.8 Force would have to go through 0.8m distance to get to point A.
No, only the perpendicular distance matters. (The distance perpendicular to the line of force.) As far as the 2.8 N force is concerned, that 0.8m distance could be 800m and it would make no difference. Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/torq.html" (Torque is another name for moment.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Finally i get it. Ok i got a questions to ask.

1: When does clockwise become negative? When i look at the notes i have been given. Sometimes its negative and sometimes it's not. Does it only become negative when an Anticlockwise force is present?

thanks by the way.
 
mechanicstudy said:
1: When does clockwise become negative? When i look at the notes i have been given. Sometimes its negative and sometimes it's not.
Calling clockwise moments negative is just the standard convention. Often you only care about the magnitude of the torque, so the direction doesn't matter.
Does it only become negative when an Anticlockwise force is present?
You must distinguish anticlockwise from clockwise torques when both are present, and using the standard sign convention is a great way to do that.
 
Doc Al said:
Calling clockwise moments negative is just the standard convention. Often you only care about the magnitude of the torque, so the direction doesn't matter.

You must distinguish anticlockwise from clockwise torques when both are present, and using the standard sign convention is a great way to do that.

thank you. My notes just seem to neglect information like that and it has left me confused.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K