Why Does 3-Methylheptane Have 18 Hydrogens Instead of 16?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tica86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
AI Thread Summary
3-Methylheptane contains 8 carbons, not 7, due to the presence of a methyl group attached to the third carbon. The correct formula for calculating hydrogens is CnH2n+2, which for 8 carbons results in C8H18. The confusion arises from miscounting the carbons in the structure. Therefore, 3-methylheptane has 18 hydrogens instead of 16. Understanding the correct carbon count is essential for accurate hydrogen calculations.
tica86
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
So I am given 3-methylheptane I know that it looks like this:


CH3-CH2-CH-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3
And the methyl group is attached to CH

It is heptane so I have 7 carbons and a total of 15 Hydrogens but I don't understand why it isn't 16 Hydrogens don't I use the formula
CnH2n+2=16Hydrogen
If I don't use the formula then how do I determine the number of Hydrogens?

Can someone please explain, I don't understand why one of it's Hydrogen is replaced with methyl, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3-Methylheptane actually contains 8 carbons, not seven (Remember the naming, it is heptane (7 carbons), plus a methy group (on the 3rd carbon) is a -CH3 group). Thus, using your formula CnH2n+2, you should have C8H18, not C7H16 or C8H16. :)

By the way, the structural skeleton form is: CH3-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
17K
Back
Top