Why does a ball rebounds more over the edges?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kushubham9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of a ball rebounding to different heights when dropped on a flat surface versus the edge of a table. Participants explore the factors influencing the rebound height, including the area of impact and the mechanics of energy transfer during the bounce.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if both the table and the ball were rigid, the bounce height would be the same, implying that the table's material properties may affect the rebound.
  • Another participant questions whether the ball actually rebounds to a greater height when dropped on the edge, indicating a need for more experimental detail.
  • A further contribution posits that the ball may travel further when rebounding at an angle due to the mechanics of parabolic motion, suggesting that gravity's effect varies with the angle of impact.
  • One participant claims that bouncing on a flat surface distributes stress evenly, while bouncing on the edge applies higher localized stress, resulting in greater compression and energy gain for the ball.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the ball actually rebounds to a greater height when dropped on the edge, with some questioning the conditions of the experiment and others proposing various hypotheses about the mechanics involved. No consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of experimental conditions, such as the type of surface and the angle of impact, which may influence the outcomes discussed. There is also mention of the need for more detailed descriptions of the experiments conducted.

kushubham9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I need an explanation for this demo.
When a ball falls on a table, it rebounds to a certain height,, but when it falls on the edge of the same table, it rebounds to a much greater height.. What are the factors responsible for the re-bounce?
How does area of impact effect it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the table and the ball were rigid bodies, bounce would be the same. In this case, I suspect that the middle of your table has less stiffness and more ability to absorb energy. Another table may behave differently.
 
kushubham9 said:
Hello,
I need an explanation for this demo.
When a ball falls on a table, it rebounds to a certain height,, but when it falls on the edge of the same table, it rebounds to a much greater height.. What are the factors responsible for the re-bounce?
How does area of impact effect it?

Does it actually bounce to a greater height?
 
Andy Resnick said:
Does it actually bounce to a greater height?

That occurred to me, too. It may go shooting off to the side but not actually get any higher. More description of the actual experiment is needed for a good (suggested) answer. Did you try it on concrete?
 
Just establishing what I anticipate to be an enriching opportunity in tenure of the scientifically literate cognoscenti. (This is my first post in this entire forums.) xD

Bearing in mind that I do not specialize in any means of physics, I suppose I may qualify for the approval of various hypotheses of which have so happened to randomly wander past the reactionary consciousness of my brain to the general community at hand.

Assuming that you were speaking specifically in terms of distance per the trajectory of the ball as apart from angle, velocity, height etc., I would postulate that the ball travels further simply owing to the fact that the exertion of gravity has less of a hold on parabolic arcs whereas the pull of gravity is potentially maximized whence the ball strikes perpendicular along a surface parallel to the ground. To provide a schematic reference, perhaps you should consider the analogy of a triangular array so fashioned as to acknowledge the coherence of physical transmogrification of the comprehensibility pertaining to the whole of science. Applying the concept of a right-angled triangle, the ball, as reciprocated from the edge of contact, would traverse greater distance along the hypotenuse than any other side, eschewing the complexification of transitioning states along with any other changing factors indifferent to the element of gravitational mediation. The force of gravity is constant, but the ball still ventures further out when it rebounds at an angle than if it were simply to ricochet orthogonally on the plane of reception.

Again, hello everyone (in the name of science).
 
Its the pressure that did the job. Bouncing on a flat surface gives an equal stress on the ball. When you did it on the edges, you give a higher stress on a particular point. the ball get compressed more than on a flat surface, more energy is gained. For you information, you get the greatest bounce when the edge hits the ball at right angle at the middle of the ball :) .
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K