Why does a photon emit discrete frequencies of light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons why atoms emit discrete frequencies of light, focusing on the underlying quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of the hydrogen atom. Participants explore concepts such as energy levels, wave functions, superposition, and the implications of quantum theory on photon emissions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that solving the Schrödinger wave function for the hydrogen atom reveals discrete energy levels, but questions why only these levels are observed in emission spectra despite the possibility of superpositions.
  • Another participant asserts that there is no explanation for why electrons can only transition between discrete energy levels, referencing Planck's discovery of the constant without understanding its origin.
  • A participant clarifies that a photon in a superposition state does not equate to a photon with an average energy of the superposed states.
  • Reference is made to David Bohm's work as a potential source for a clearer physical rationale regarding the topic.
  • One participant elaborates that while superpositions exist, photon emissions correspond to specific energy differences due to the collapse of the wavefunction, which is seen as an empirical fact of nature.
  • Another participant discusses the wave nature of particles and how stationary states lead to discrete energy levels, suggesting that relaxing these conditions could lead to non-discrete energy levels.
  • One participant proposes that the phenomenon can be understood through interference and resonance in wave mechanics, drawing an analogy to musical instruments and their emission of specific frequencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the reasons behind the emission of discrete frequencies, with no consensus reached on a definitive explanation. Some agree on the empirical nature of the observed phenomena, while others propose different theoretical frameworks.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the fundamental reasons behind discrete energy levels and the implications of superposition, suggesting that certain assumptions and conditions may affect the discussion.

enwa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Why does an atom emit discrete frequencies of light?

Solving the Schrödinger wave function for the hydrogen atom (that is a single particle representing an electron bound by a spherical potential) we find that it has discrete energy levels. Plotting every possible value of [itex]f[/itex] in [itex]E'-E = \hbar f[/itex] where [itex]E'[/itex] and [itex]E[/itex] are the different energy levels of eigenstates we recover the emission spectra.

What I don't understand is why we only see these discrete energy levels. According to the superposition principle, the wave function could be in a superposition with expected energy [itex]\tfrac{1}{2}(E'+E)[/itex] but differences from these levels don't show up on the emission spectra. The measurement postulate seems relevant, "measurement" collapses a wave function into an eigenstate, this seems to be happening before and after the photon emission, can anyone explain why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think there is an answer as to WHY electrons can only move between orbitals and energies in values of h, just that they do. Plank discovered this constant without having any answer to why it was this way and that particular value, only that it was.
 
The reason is that a photon in a superposition of (|E1>+|E2>)/sqrt(2) is not the same as a photon with energy (E1+E2)/2.
 
If you're looking for a physical rationale one of the clearest is in David Bohm's "Quantum Theory" chapter 6 or thereabouts (don't have the book here)
 
To elaborate on LearningDG's remark, while superpositions are allowed and inevitable, when photon emissions are measured the wavefunction is collapsed according to the Born principle, which picks out a particular discrete pair of energy levels.

All the superposition tells you is the probability of particular transitions. When you observe a transition (photon emission) it will almost always correspond to the energy difference of two levels. Why so? I'm not sure it is any more than a fundamental empirical fact---this is how nature is, so it is a postulate of QM. That's why I have to say "almost always", simply because no one has ever observed otherwise, but there is no known necessity for nature to be this way.

You could ask the further question "why then are the energy levels discrete?": the answer is again deeply one of the empirical facts about nature, but we understand it in terms of quantum theory as a result of the wave nature of particle states, i.e., since the electrons are wave-like they exist in stationary orbitals only by virtue of being held in 3D standing wave formation. If they were not standing wave solutions they would not be stationary, they'd instead be time-dependent. Hence the mathematics for time independent solutions dictates spherical harmonics (standing waves in 3D), these are labeled by integer solutions, hence discrete energies. Most students understand this first from the simpler mathematical analysis of an idealized quantum particle in a box (infinite square well potential).

If you were to relax the requirement of stationary (i.e., time independent) states then presumably the wave function solutions would no longer necessarily correspond to spherical harmonics, and the energy levels could be all over the place. This might be set up, say for example, if you bombard an atom with an intense laser, or impose some other kind of drastic nonlinear dynamical perturbation of the atomic electrons. Good luck to you if you want to calculate the energy levels and transition amplitudes in such situations!
 
I think one can give a kind of reason as to "why this is." It has to do with the importance of interference and resonance in wave mechanics, and the presence of a quantized action. An atom emitting light is usually only perturbed a very tiny amount, such that the perturbation wouldn't amount to squat over a single cycle of the atom's periodic oscillation (periodicities in the wave function are pretty much the main crux of orbital quantum mechanics). So to get the atom to emit light, one has to "tickle" it over and over, in synch with the natural frequencies that can yield constructive interference within the atom. That's called a resonance, it's pretty much why a guitar string emits notes rather than white noise. Indeed, your question is quite intimately related to "why do musical instruments emit sound at special frequencies." It comes from the combination of having a resonant frequency in the system, and obeying the interference-regulated rules of waves. Now, it should be noted that guitar strings can be any length, so can make any note, but on the atomic scale we encounter the quantization of the action-- the scale is small enough to probe the minimum scale on which action can appear. That's what creates "guitar strings" in atoms that cannot be just any length.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K