B Why does a stiff boat rudder produce forward thrust when pumped left to right?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jurgen M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Thrust
AI Thread Summary
Rudder pumping in small sailing boats like the Optimist can generate forward thrust even when the rudder is stiff, due to pressure differentials created as the rudder moves. The discussion emphasizes that while Newton's third law explains the basic action-reaction principle, a deeper understanding of pressure distribution is necessary to grasp how thrust is produced. A flexible rudder, akin to diving flippers, could theoretically enhance thrust by allowing for more effective water displacement. The optimal angle for rudder pumping to maximize thrust is not fixed and depends on various factors, including boat design and conditions. Ultimately, the mechanics of water flow and pressure imbalances are crucial to understanding how rudder movement translates into propulsion.
  • #101
Yes I understand the setup, I just don't necessarilly believe the analysis is complete.. Not a big deal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
pbuk said:
No it is not like that at all. Let's start with the diagram on the right with the rudder stationary at position S.
  1. The rudder is accelerated rapidly backwards, creating a high pressure on its rear face and pushing the boat forwards.
  2. Somewhere around M the force on the tiller is reduced and the rotational speed of the rudder slows.
  3. This allows pressure on each side of the rudder to nearly equalise, reducing yaw and allowing the flow to become laminar reducing drag.
  4. This slow movement of the rudder is continued through C until it reaches S on the other side when the cycle is repeated.
Please don't complicate things by talking about pumping the sail (particularly not strong wind pumping as shown in the video), the factors at work in pumping are completely different.
That sounds reasonable with the non-constant rotational velocity of the rudder.
 
  • #103
pbuk said:
No it is not like that at all. Let's start with the diagram on the right with the rudder stationary at position S.
  1. The rudder is accelerated rapidly backwards, creating a high pressure on its rear face and pushing the boat forwards.
  2. Somewhere around M the force on the tiller is reduced and the rotational speed of the rudder slows.
  3. This allows pressure on each side of the rudder to nearly equalise, reducing yaw and allowing the flow to become laminar reducing drag.
  4. This slow movement of the rudder is continued through C until it reaches S on the other side when the cycle is repeated.
I didnt include in my description, purposely reduced rudder rotation during strokes,like we have learn in sailing school.(Because I was expcted that we will come with anylasis to this conclusion.
I want that theory confirm what we are doing in practice is correct)

But fur sure ,you must reduced rotation speed during forwards half strokes and increase rotation speed during backward half strokes.

"Hard on rudder from sides to center, easy from center to the sides", our coach yelled at us.

Rudder is very unefficient in producing thrust, it is not like fish tail.Fish tail and flippers produce thrust in both half-strokes,becuase of flexibility.
That is why I noted few times, that rudder is stiff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #104
256bits said:
That sounds reasonable with the non-constant rotational velocity of the rudder.
Totally reasonable. Followed by:
Jurgen M said:
"Hard on rudder from sides to center, easy from center to the sides", our coach yelled at us.
and that statement, along with a conservation law, explains the whole thing to some extent. Whatever mechanism happens to be at work under the water, the evidence involves the forces on the tiller and the distance moved by the face of the rudder.
For a deeper explanation, we have to look at the way the water moves and even the effect of the keel on that motion. If we were not dealing with water (and talking about trying the same trick on a sandy beach) the force / speed relationship could be different. There would be more 'grip' at low speeds and less grip as the rudder breaks free from the sand. I could even believe the effect would be totally the reverse.
 
  • Like
Likes Jurgen M
  • #105
sophiecentaur said:
This is so blindingly obvious that I have to conclude that people are getting their backwards's and forwards's mixed up. .
Yes it is so obvius why duck minimize surface area of foot during forward stroke.

 
  • #106
Attemps to create a helicopter by watching a hummingbird were not very fruitful. I think the motion of rudder propulsion is more like that of a tuna than a duck but may be completely different from either because of the suppleness of the natural systems. I do sort of understand an Evinrude.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #107
hutchphd said:
I think the motion of rudder propulsion is more like that of a tuna than a duck
Yes. A stiff rudder cannot minimize its cross section like a duck's foot.
 
  • #108
Nor can it flex longitudinally like a tuna.
 
  • Like
Likes Jurgen M and hutchphd
  • #109
Tuna is one of the stiffer swimmers.

1660577838895.png
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and hutchphd
  • #110
pbuk said:
Nor can it flex longitudinally like a tuna.
I disagree. The combination of boathull plus rudder does flex. I think a rudder by itself would work less well.
 
  • Informative
Likes DaveC426913
  • #111
DaveC426913 said:
Yes. A stiff rudder cannot minimize its cross section like a duck's foot.
But its effective cross section will depend on the speed relative to the water.
hutchphd said:
I disagree. The combination of boathull plus rudder does flex. I think a rudder by itself would work less well.
Yes. A rudder at the back of a large rectangular raft would behave differently.
 
  • #112
DaveC426913 said:
A stiff rudder cannot minimize its cross section like a duck's foot.
For sure rudder can not do this but it would be better if can do it.
This is just one more confirmation that rudder produce drag during forward stroke.
 
  • #113
To me it seems like the rudder and the hull make the crude motion of a swimming fish.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #114
Jurgen M said:
For sure rudder can not do this but it would be better if can do it.
This is just one more confirmation that rudder produce drag during forward stroke.
All things with mass produce drag. Generalizations are never, ever useful.

The issue is whether it produces more thrust than drag.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and sophiecentaur
  • #115
DaveC426913 said:
The issue is whether it produces more thrust than drag.
How do you mean "whether it", so you think that rudder maybe produce net thrust in forward stroke?

How would you describe rudder during forward stroke, in terms of pressures and net force direction?
 
  • #116
Jurgen M said:
How do you mean "whether it", so you doubt that rudder maybe produce net thrust in forward stroke?
He meant whether it produces more force than drag over the whole cycle. Please stop revisiting over and over again the idea that a flat surface moving forwards through the water can produce a net force in the forward direction, it cannot.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #117
pbuk said:
Please stop revisiting over and over again the idea that a flat surface moving forwards through the water can produce a net force in the forward direction, it cannot.
This not my idea, this completely unlogic idea starts members from this forum.
For sure it can not produce thrust.
 
  • #118
This thread has more than run its course. Thanks for your contributions everyone. Thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and russ_watters
Back
Top