Why Does Adding 2π to the Phase Angle Yield Equivalent Solutions in SHM?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in simple harmonic motion (SHM) involving the determination of the phase angle based on given maximum velocity and velocity at time zero. The original poster questions the reasoning behind adding multiples of 2π to the phase angle, seeking clarification on its implications in the context of SHM.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between phase angles in SHM and the equivalence of angles differing by multiples of 2π. The original poster questions the validity of using π - x_rad as a phase angle, citing its implications on the direction of motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of phase angles in SHM. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equivalence of states at different phase angles, but multiple interpretations and clarifications are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

The problem is framed within the constraints of a homework assignment, and there is an emphasis on understanding the implications of phase angles rather than arriving at a definitive solution.

salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
In simple harmonic motion example there is a question

velocity max is given
velocity at time = 0 is given (which is not equal to maximum velocity --> not at equilibrium point at time=0)
graph is also given of the velocity function

IT asks to find the phase angle

in the solution they use the formula

v(t)=-vmaxsin(\omegat + \varphi)

using vmax and v(0) they solve for \varphi

then they add 2pie to it and say the answer is either x rad or 2pie + xrad (where x is the answer they found)

why do they add this 2pie (i know it has the same value but it can then be k2pie where k is any integer since x rad + 2pie or x rad + 4 pie or x rad + 6pie etc. will also give u the same answer)


any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a HW question. Anyway, you've given some thought to it. You are right -- adding 2k*pi to any angle makes it the same.

Are you sure they are not saying (pi-x_rad)?
 
no that is also an answer yes but they say it is not the phase angle because if u use the angle u get from pie - x_rad that gives u the angle when the "slope" of the graph is increasing and therefore meaning the direction of the particle moving changes. IT is suppose to be going away from the equilibirum but if u say the phase angle is pie minus xrad then that means its is going towards the equilibrium point.
 
Then it is the simple and correct answer that at phase omega+2n*pi, the particle is in the identical state. You cannot distinguish the state of the particle between any of these states, and that is why it's called to be in the same phase. (Actually, it had been my mistake not to explain to you sooner.)

Suppose a wave is moving. Then all the particles which are in the same phase along the wave are those that that have the angles as 2n*pi + omega, where n is any integer, +ve, -ve or zero. They have the same velocity in the same direction, and are at the same distance from the mean position
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K