Why does C-C have a higher bond energy than B-N in hBN and graphene?

  • Thread starter Thread starter james weaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Strength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparison of bond energies between carbon-carbon (C-C) bonds in graphene and boron-nitrogen (B-N) bonds in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). Participants explore the implications of these bond energies on properties such as thermal conductivity, particularly in the context of materials science and engineering applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that C-C bonds in graphene are double bonds with delocalized electrons, contributing to their strength.
  • Another participant suggests that hBN is isoelectronic with graphene, which could imply similar bond strengths.
  • It is mentioned that the bonds in hBN are highly polar, which may affect their bond energy compared to C-C bonds.
  • A participant argues that the bond strength in hBN is similar to that of graphene, but attributes the difference in thermal conductivity primarily to differences in electrical conductivity between the two materials.
  • There is a discussion about how thermal conductivity is influenced by the propagation of energy through the lattice, involving phonons and electrons, with graphene being a conductor and hBN an insulator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the bond strength and energy of C-C versus B-N bonds, with some suggesting similarities and others emphasizing differences. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact reasons for the differences in bond energies and their implications for thermal conductivity.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the assumptions regarding bond polarity, the influence of electron delocalization, or the specific contributions of phonons versus electrons to thermal conductivity.

james weaver
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Hi everyone, this is my first post in the chemistry section. I am doing a project for my engineering class on "cutting edge" materials and the one I chose is hexagonal boron nitride (specifically in the form of nanotubes). In comparing hBN to graphene, I need to explain to the class why graphene has a much higher thermal conductivity. From what I've read, non-metals transfer heat via vibrations in their lattice structures. As I understand it, atoms with higher bond energies have a stiffer spring-like effect which enables them to transfer heat quicker (makes sense because B-N has lower bond energy than C-C). My question is this:

Why does C-C have a higher bond energy than B-N? I thought that non-polar bonds in general have lower bond energies, and this case C-C has the less polar bond but higher bond energy.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
DrClaude said:
The carbon-carbon bonds in graphene are double bonds and the electrons are delocalized over many carbon atoms
hBN seems to be isoelectronic with graphene, which suggests bonds of a comparable strength, doesn't it?
 
Borek said:
hBN seems to be isoelectronic with graphene, which suggests bonds of a comparable strength, doesn't it?
Good point. But the bonds are highly polar.
 
The bond strength in hBN is similar to that of graphene. The thermal conductivity difference is almost entirely because of the electrical conductivity difference.

Thermal conductivity in general is determined by propagation of energy through the lattice, in the form of either phonons or electrons. hBN and graphene have similar phonon spectra, but hBN is an electrical insulator, whereas graphene is an electrical conductor, so electrons contribute substantially to the thermal conductivity in graphene but not hBN.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, Borek, HAYAO and 1 other person

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
23K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K