Why does C-C have a higher bond energy than B-N in hBN and graphene?

  • Thread starter Thread starter james weaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Strength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) nanotubes and their thermal conductivity compared to graphene. It highlights that graphene exhibits significantly higher thermal conductivity due to its electrical conductivity, which allows electrons to contribute to heat transfer. While both materials have similar phonon spectra, hBN acts as an electrical insulator, limiting its thermal conductivity. The conversation also touches on bond energies, noting that carbon-carbon bonds in graphene are stronger due to their double bond nature and delocalized electrons, despite hBN being isoelectronic with graphene. The polar nature of hBN's bonds is acknowledged, but it is emphasized that the primary factor for the thermal conductivity difference lies in the materials' electrical properties.
james weaver
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Hi everyone, this is my first post in the chemistry section. I am doing a project for my engineering class on "cutting edge" materials and the one I chose is hexagonal boron nitride (specifically in the form of nanotubes). In comparing hBN to graphene, I need to explain to the class why graphene has a much higher thermal conductivity. From what I've read, non-metals transfer heat via vibrations in their lattice structures. As I understand it, atoms with higher bond energies have a stiffer spring-like effect which enables them to transfer heat quicker (makes sense because B-N has lower bond energy than C-C). My question is this:

Why does C-C have a higher bond energy than B-N? I thought that non-polar bonds in general have lower bond energies, and this case C-C has the less polar bond but higher bond energy.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
DrClaude said:
The carbon-carbon bonds in graphene are double bonds and the electrons are delocalized over many carbon atoms
hBN seems to be isoelectronic with graphene, which suggests bonds of a comparable strength, doesn't it?
 
Borek said:
hBN seems to be isoelectronic with graphene, which suggests bonds of a comparable strength, doesn't it?
Good point. But the bonds are highly polar.
 
The bond strength in hBN is similar to that of graphene. The thermal conductivity difference is almost entirely because of the electrical conductivity difference.

Thermal conductivity in general is determined by propagation of energy through the lattice, in the form of either phonons or electrons. hBN and graphene have similar phonon spectra, but hBN is an electrical insulator, whereas graphene is an electrical conductor, so electrons contribute substantially to the thermal conductivity in graphene but not hBN.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara, Borek, HAYAO and 1 other person
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top