Why Does Calculating Train Engine Power Result in Different Values?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the maximum power of a train engine traveling at 50 meters per second with a resistance of 30 kilonewtons yields a result of 1.5 megawatts, while the answer book states 1.47 megawatts. The discrepancy arises from the misunderstanding of how to apply force and power calculations, as force and power are different units and should not be subtracted directly. Gravity does not affect the horizontal motion of a level train, and the calculation involving gravity is incorrect. The book's answer may stem from an error or modification in the problem statement that was not properly verified. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate problem interpretation in physics calculations.
Bix
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
How did you find PF?: Online

[Thread moved from the New Member Intro forum, so no Schoolwork Template is shown]

Hi. I'm new and am trying to solve a simple question 'Find the max power of a train engine traveling level at 50 metres per second if total resistance to motion is 30 KiloNewtons.

I get power = force times velocity so 30000 x 50 = 1500000 = 1.5 Mega Watts. My answer book says 1.47 Mega Watts. I can see how 1.5MW minus 30KW = 1500000 - 30000 = 1.47MW. Also I can see that power times gravity of 9.8 = 1.5 MW times 9.8 N gives the same answer.

I can't see how you should subtract the force from the sum of the force and the distance, or how vertical gravity can reduce the speed of a horizontally moving train. Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math seems fine. Subtracting 30KW doesn't make sense since 30KW hasn't been computed anywhere, making it a random number. Subtracting the force doesn't make sense since force and power are different units and cannot be added. And yes, gravity plays no role since the problem says 'level'. Also 1.5MW * 9.8 m/sec² results in 14.7 mega-something, not 1.47 mega-something.

I cannot explain the book answer.
 
I think these book/web errors often arise when someone modifies the question and fails to check the answer given elsewhere.
That 9.8 produces the right leading digits is suggestive. The original might have been something like "a train of mass 30,000 kg and rolling resistance (or "rolling friction" or whatever) of 0.1..."
 
Thanks guys, massively appreciated :)
Interesting insight haruspex..
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top