Why Does Cramster Simplify Velocity Components Incorrectly in Physics Problems?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Fellowroot
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This problem is from Modern Physics by Kenneth Krane 2nd ED

The problem is:

An atom of mass m moving in the x direction with speed v collides elastically with an atom of mass 3m at rest. After the collision the first atom moves in the y direction. Find the direction of motion of the second atom and the speeds of both atoms in terms of v after the collision.

Now my question is not how to solve this problem, it is to try and understand a math step involved in this problem from a solution off of cramster.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



On cramster they reduce this:

9v[itex]^{2}_{}[/itex]cos[itex]^{2}[/itex](x)+9v[itex]^{2}_{}[/itex]cos[itex]^{2}[/itex](x)

to this:

9v[itex]^{2}[/itex]

But when I did the problem and got down to their step I have this:

9v[itex]^{2}_{x}[/itex]cos[itex]^{2}[/itex](x)+9v[itex]^{2}_{y}[/itex]cos[itex]^{2}[/itex](x)

Those velocities are different components an x and a y, which they neglected to distinguish on cramster.

I know that:

3cos[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) + 3sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) = 3

But I don't see how they came to their conclusion because the x and y components could be different.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is about 3 pages of work to get to that equation but I don't think I have made a mistake. So its pretty hard to post it. Also if I go by their solution they actually get the correct answer in the end but at the same time I'm very sure that they are indeed two different components. Thanks though.