Why Does Dropping a Ball into a Well Result in Different Energy Sums?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy dynamics of a ball dropped into a well, specifically addressing the sum of kinetic and potential energy at different points in the ball's descent and after it comes to rest in the mud. Participants explore concepts related to conservation of energy, the effects of friction, and the calculation of potential energy at various depths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the sum of kinetic and potential energy is zero just before the ball hits the bottom, suggesting it is due to conservation of energy but expressing uncertainty about the mathematical proof.
  • Others clarify that while the kinetic energy is positive, the potential energy becomes negative as the ball descends, leading to a total sum of zero.
  • There is confusion regarding the difference in energy sums before and after the ball hits the bottom, particularly why the sum after coming to rest in the mud is -196 J instead of zero.
  • Some participants propose that energy is conserved overall, but the sum of kinetic and potential energy changes due to external work done by friction in the mud.
  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy at a depth of 10 meters and how it relates to the kinetic energy lost due to friction.
  • Multiple participants emphasize that mechanical energy is conserved only in the absence of external forces, noting that once the ball hits the mud, additional forces come into play, affecting the energy calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of conservation of energy, particularly regarding the role of external forces and friction. There is no consensus on the interpretation of energy sums at different stages of the ball's motion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the energy conservation equation, the role of friction, and the definitions of kinetic and potential energy at various points in the scenario. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, contributing to the confusion.

bigsmile
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A 2.00-kg ball has zero kinetic and potential energy. John drops the ball into a 10.0-m-deep well.
1) Just before the ball hits the bottom, the sum of its kinetic and potential energy is: Zero J
2) After the ball comes to a stop in the mud, the sum of its potential and kinetic energy is: -196 J

On #1, why is "sum of kinetic and potential energy" turns to zero? I just guess it is due to conservation of energy, but I don't know how to use Math to prove it.

I know in theory Sum of all work equals the change of KE. I am not sure how to apply here. Before the ball hits the bottom, it should still have velocity and KE >0,

In addition, I really don't understand why the answer in both #1 and #2 are different. I thought the answer to #2 is also zero too due to conservation of energy. Why is the sum equal to a) a negative 196 instead of +196 and b) final potential energy of -196 J?

I am very confused. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigsmile said:
On #1, why is "sum of kinetic and potential energy" turns to zero? I just guess it is due to conservation of energy, but I don't know how to use Math to prove it.
0=0? You can calculate the initial sum of 0+0=0, and you know the sum is conserved.
bigsmile said:
it should still have velocity and KE >0,
Sure, its kinetic energy is positive. Its potential energy is negative. The sum is zero.

For (b), just calculate the potential energy of a ball 10 meter below zero.
The kinetic energy is lost due to friction in the mud.
 
mfb said:
0=0? You can calculate the initial sum of 0+0=0, and you know the sum is conserved.
Sure, its kinetic energy is positive. Its potential energy is negative. The sum is zero.

For (b), just calculate the potential energy of a ball 10 meter below zero.
The kinetic energy is lost due to friction in the mud.

After it goes into the mud and KE is lost due to friction, is energy still conserved at that point?
Initial: 0 + 0 = 0 ( initial PE + initial KE = 0)
In the mud: KE (final) + PE(final) = Friction + (- mgh) = 0= KE (initial) + PE (initial)?
I am confused on how to use the Conservation of Energy equation to show all the relationship among the numbers in the mud. Any guidance?
Is my reasoning incorrect somewhere?
 
bigsmile said:
After it goes into the mud and KE is lost due to friction, is energy still conserved at that point?
Overall energy is conserved, but the sum of kinetic and potential energy changes as this sum doesn't include friction in the mud. Ignore energy conservation for (2), it doesn't help there.
 
bigsmile said:
A 2.00-kg ball has zero kinetic and potential energy. John drops the ball into a 10.0-m-deep well.
1) Just before the ball hits the bottom, the sum of its kinetic and potential energy is: Zero J
2) After the ball comes to a stop in the mud, the sum of its potential and kinetic energy is: -196 J

On #1, why is "sum of kinetic and potential energy" turns to zero? I just guess it is due to conservation of energy, but I don't know how to use Math to prove it.

I know in theory Sum of all work equals the change of KE. I am not sure how to apply here. Before the ball hits the bottom, it should still have velocity and KE >0,

In addition, I really don't understand why the answer in both #1 and #2 are different. I thought the answer to #2 is also zero too due to conservation of energy. Why is the sum equal to a) a negative 196 instead of +196 and b) final potential energy of -196 J?

I am very confused. Please help.
What is the question? What are youn required to find?
 
I am guessing the problem is with your understanding of the energy equation.The law of conservation of energy states that "The total energy of a system remains a constant till external work is done on it."

Basically, final energy = initial energy + external work.

So for your questions, the answers can now be figured out. In 1) there are no external forces doing work on the ball. Hence total energy remains conserved = 0.
In 2) the normal reaction by the mud does work on the ball-ground system (just take it to be on the ball). This work appears in the RHS of the above equation. From the work energy theorem, work done = change in KE=196 J.

Note that by energy I mean kinetic +potential energy and by external work I mean work done by any force not part of system.
 
At the top of the well, kinetic energy Ktop = 0J, potential energy Utop = 0. This is given. So total mechanical energy Etop = 0
1. Just before the ball hits the bottom, the total mechanical energy must still be the same, by conservation of energy. Ebot = 0. Calculate the potential energy Ubot at the bottom. It will come out to be - 196 J. The means the kinetic energy must be + 196 J.
2. Once it comes to a stop in the mud, the potential energy is still the same, since the height has not changed, so it is still - 196 J. The kinetic energy is now zero since the ball has come to rest. So the total energy is - 196 J.
Mechanical energy is conserved only for an isolated system. As long as the ball is still in flight, in steps 1 and 2, there is no force other than gravity, acting on the ball. So the mechanical energy in step 2 is still zero. Once the ball hits the bottom, there is an extra force exerted by the mud. So the mechanical energy is not conserved.
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
At the top of the well, kinetic energy Ktop = 0J, potential energy Utop = 0. This is given. So total mechanical energy Etop = 0
1. Just before the ball hits the bottom, the total mechanical energy must still be the same, by conservation of energy. Ebot = 0. Calculate the potential energy Ubot at the bottom. It will come out to be - 196 J. The means the kinetic energy must be + 196 J.
2. Once it comes to a stop in the mud, the potential energy is still the same, since the height has not changed, so it is still - 196 J. The kinetic energy is now zero since the ball has come to rest. So the total energy is - 196 J.
Mechanical energy is conserved only for an isolated system. As long as the ball is still in flight, in steps 1 and 2, there is no force other than gravity, acting on the ball. So the mechanical energy in step 2 is still zero. Once the ball hits the bottom, there is an extra force exerted by the mud. So the mechanical energy is not conserved.
Sorry about the sentence: So the mechanical energy in step 2 is still zero". It should have been mechanical energy before step 2, that is, before the ball hits the mud.
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
At the top of the well, kinetic energy Ktop = 0J, potential energy Utop = 0. This is given. So total mechanical energy Etop = 0
1. Just before the ball hits the bottom, the total mechanical energy must still be the same, by conservation of energy. Ebot = 0. Calculate the potential energy Ubot at the bottom. It will come out to be - 196 J. The means the kinetic energy must be + 196 J.
2. Once it comes to a stop in the mud, the potential energy is still the same, since the height has not changed, so it is still - 196 J. The kinetic energy is now zero since the ball has come to rest. So the total energy is - 196 J.
Mechanical energy is conserved only for an isolated system. As long as the ball is still in flight, in steps 1 and 2, there is no force other than gravity, acting on the ball. So the mechanical energy in step 2 is still zero. Once the ball hits the bottom, there is an extra force exerted by the mud. So the mechanical energy is not conserved.

Same thing I said. Well put though.
 
  • #10
CrazyNinja said:
Same thing I said. Well put though.
Thanks. Looks like our responses arrived at nearly the same time.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
0=0? You can calculate the initial sum of 0+0=0, and you know the sum is conserved.
Sure, its kinetic energy is positive. Its potential energy is negative. The sum is zero.

For (b), just calculate the potential energy of a ball 10 meter below zero.
The kinetic energy is lost due to friction in the mud.

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K