Why Does Electron Energy Have Negative Values?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of negative energy values for electrons in atoms, particularly in hydrogen. Participants explore the implications of these negative values, their interpretations, and the underlying physics related to bound states and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that negative energy values indicate that electrons are in a bound state, where total energy can be negative while kinetic energy remains positive.
  • One participant suggests that the negative energy can be interpreted as binding energy, which is the energy required to separate an electron from its nucleus to a reference state where both are at rest and far apart.
  • Another viewpoint argues against the concept of 'negative energy', stating that energy is a description of potential state changes and that negative values depend on the chosen reference point.
  • Some participants propose that energy levels can be considered as potentials, relating them to concepts like electrical and gravitational potential.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of negative energy, with some agreeing on the concept of binding energy while others challenge the notion of negative energy itself. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various definitions and frameworks for understanding energy and potential, indicating that the discussion is influenced by differing conceptual approaches and assumptions about energy states.

quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2
hi,

why are the energy levels of electrons in say a hydrogen atom -13.6ev, -3.4 eV etc ?

i thought energy is always positive? what does the negative mean?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Total energy can be negative, it's just kinetic energy that can't be negative
The negative energy comes from the fact that the electrons are in a bound state

If the total energy were zero then the electron would be able to fly off to infinity then turn back.
E = T + V=\frac{1}{2}m\ v^2 -\frac{e}{r}

The potential energy due to the nucleus is negative because it causes an attractive force.

So when the electron has negative energy it is bound to a region of certain r, the boundary of which should be when the kinetic energy goes to zero (a turning point)
E=- \frac{e}{r}
r = -\frac{e}{E}

Since E is a negative quantity this becomes
r = \frac{e}{|E|}

If the energy is zero then the turning point happens at
\frac{e}{r}=0

So r goes to infinity then turns back.

That's what it means classically and the idea carries over into the quantum world.
 
It depends on what you define as a reference. If the reference for E=0 is an isolated proton and an isolated electron far away (and both at rest), then the negative energy values can be interpreted as binding energies, i.e. the energy it takes to go back to the reference configuration.
 
alright thanks!
 
There is no such thing as 'negative energy'. Energy is a description of potential state changes within a system. A system cannot not change in a manner less than if it does nothing!

You may freely define a quantity of 'potential' which may be negative with respect to some other vaule or system. In the case of an atom, the 'ground state' is the state where everything is settled and huncky-dory (that is, nothing is likely to spontaneously change) with all the electrons in their 'rightful place'. It requires energy to pull that electron off the hydrogen atom, leaving behind a 'potential hole' into which an electron will get sucked at the first opportunity so that it can get back to 'ground state'. Therefore it is denoted -ve indicating whether a return to the ground state will require, or release, energy in doing so.

Naturally, your definitions can be your own - if you were to want to define all reactions as 'a release of energy', then those that are endothermic and need energy would be a 'negative energy' process. So it is all in your definition, but the accepted convention is that a +ve ionised atom will carry a 'negative potential'.
 
so the energy levels are potentials?
 
quietrain said:
so the energy levels are potentials?

Energy is a description of potential state changes within a system.

If you want to call energy levels 'potentials', I think that's ok. 'Electrical potential' is, simply, a measure of how many Joules energy would be released per unit of charge as it drops to your 'zero' voltage datum, just as 'gravitational potential' is likewise but for mass dropping through a height to a 'zero' datum.
 
thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K