Why Does Kinematics Fail in Calculating Fmax in This Physics Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xstetsonx
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the failure of kinematic equations to accurately calculate the maximum force (Fmax) in a physics problem involving a 400 g particle. The participant initially attempted to use the kinematic equation to derive Fmax but realized that the correct approach involves work and energy principles. The correct calculation for Fmax is derived from the work done by the force, leading to the conclusion that Fmax equals 4.8 N, not the 2.4 N initially calculated using kinematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles in physics
  • Knowledge of integration for calculating work done by a force
  • Basic concepts of kinematics and motion along the x-axis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem and its applications in physics problems
  • Learn about integration techniques for calculating work done by variable forces
  • Explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in different contexts
  • Review kinematic equations and their limitations in non-constant force scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the application of work and energy principles in solving mechanics problems.

xstetsonx
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A 400 g particle moving along the x-axis experiences the force shown in Figure Ex11.15. The particle goes from vx = 2.5 m/s at x = 0 m to vx = 5.5 m/s at x = 2 m. What is Fmax?

my solution manual told me to do this with work and energy

but why can't i do
kinematic:
5.5^2=2.5^2+2A2=6

F=ma
(0.4KG)(6m/s^2)=.5Fmax(2)=2.4N
area under the curve--triangle---

but the correct answer is 4.8N...ugh
 

Attachments

  • eq0e4w86.jpg
    eq0e4w86.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 538
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait the area underneath the curve is work right and my answer is the total force? ... so i have to do W=(F)(delta X)??
 
If the curve had the force as a function of time then your approach would work.

m(v_2-v_1) = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} F(t) dt

this is simply F=ma integrated

but since it isn't you can't do this and you will have to use

W = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} F(x) \cdot dx
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
12K