Why does light travel at light speed?

Click For Summary
Light travels at light speed due to its nature as a massless particle, with its speed being a fundamental property derived from the equations of relativity and electromagnetism. Photons, which are the particles of light, do not require a force to propel them; their speed is inherent. When photons from other stars reach the sun, they interact with solar material, but their origin does not affect their speed. The speed of light is constant and does not vary with the motion of the source or observer, a principle confirmed by numerous experiments. Overall, the speed of light serves as a universal constant in physics, essential for understanding the behavior of massless particles.
  • #61
Clarification for bob: if c had an infinite velocity in our reference frame, the universe we observe would instantly collapse. That is what the Maxwell equations demand, and what Einstein realized when he made 'the biggest mistake of his career' by adding the cosmological constant. That Einstein dude turned out to be pretty smart.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #62
I am a bit wary of a cosmological constant. First of all Einstein introduced it because he did not want an expanding universe, then he took it out, now its back again.
Could the electromagnetic force travel at any speed faster than light speed, say 200,000 mps and still keep within the parameters of the energy fluctuations allowed without destroying the balance of the universe?
 
  • #63
Blueplanetbob said:
I am a bit wary of a cosmological constant. First of all Einstein introduced it because he did not want an expanding universe, then he took it out, now its back again.
Ah, but look at why it's now back! Because there are good observations which are consistent with cosmological models with this constant in them (OK, it's the other way round, but the observations are what triggered the renewed interest). Also note that it's only one proposed means of accounting for the observations ... you could make a case that it gets more attention than other means because of its pedigree (and you'd've been right in the first few years; now it's possible to argue that it does fit the data better than the alternatives ... stay tuned for another decade or three!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
412
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K