Why Does My Calculation of <x^2> Yield a Negative Result?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
facenian
Messages
433
Reaction score
25

Homework Statement


Evaluate <x^2> for the wave function [itex]\psi(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk exp(-|k|/k_0)exp(ikx)[/itex]
My calculation yields a negative answer and I can't find my error


Homework Equations


[tex]|\psi(x)|^2=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dkexp(-|k|/k_0)\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'exp(-|k'|/k_0)exp(i(k-k')x)[/tex]
[tex]<x^2>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx|\psi(x)|^2x^2[/tex]
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxx^2exp(i(k-k')x)=-\frac{d^2}{dk^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxexp(i(k-k')x)=-2\pi\delta''(k-k')[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]<x^2>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'exp(-|k'|/k_0)\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dkexp(-|k|/k_0)\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxx^2exp(i(k-k')x)[/tex]
[tex]<x^2>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'exp(-|k'|/k_0)\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dkexp(-|k|/k_0)(-2\pi\delta''(k-k'))[/tex]
[tex]<x^2>=-2\pi\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'exp(-|k'|/k_0) \frac{1}{k_0^2}exp(-|k'|/k_0)[/tex]
[tex]<x^2>=-\frac{2\pi}{k_0^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'exp(-2|k'|/k_0)=-\2\pi/k_0[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have |k|. How are you differentiating it when you move '' from delta?
 
arkajad said:
You have |k|. How are you differentiating it when you move '' from delta?

[tex]\frac{d}{dk}|k|=sg(k)[\tex]<br /> where sg(k) is 1 when k> and -1 when k<0 and in the second order differenciation sg(k) behaves as a constant. Of course it is not defferentiable at k=0.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't second differentiation produce delta(k)?
 
I think the equation is
[tex]\int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x)\delta^{(n)}(x)=(-1)^nf^n(0)[/tex]
 
And sg'[k]=2delta[k].
 
I didn't know that. Where can I find a proof?
 
Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaviside_step_function"

The formal proof can be found in any text on distributions, for instance: http://www.mae.ufl.edu/~uhk/HEAVISIDE.pdf"

sg[x]=H[x]-H[-x]

therefore sg'[x]=2 delta(x).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok, thank you very much arkajad