Why does shear flow include the full width, not just contact area?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 2K views · last reply
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For QB , why shouldn't the QB = red part only ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is there anything wrong with the solution given ?
Since When we 'cut ' the boards , the b is the red part which in contact with the other board , right ? [/B]
 
Attachments
  • Textbook page 693, problem 7-37, showing a built-up wood beam with three boards bolted together, a cross-section with neutral axis and first-moment calculations, shear stress and shear flow working, and a final answer of V = 2571 lb and tau = 14.0 ksi.
    511.PNG
    68.6 KB · Views: 482
  • Handwritten cross-section of a T-shaped beam with a 1 in. flange width, a 4 in. total depth, neutral axis N, and centroid dimensions 2.666 in. and y1-bar = 1.3333 in. A red box highlights the width at section B-B.
    512.PNG
    23.1 KB · Views: 534
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:

Homework Statement


For QB , why shouldn't the QB = red part only ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is there anything wrong with the solution given ?
Since When we 'cut ' the boards , the b is the red part which in contact with the other board , right ? [/B]
Nothing wrong with solution. Remember when determining bolt shear, use the full area of connected part when determining Q.
 
Sorry to bump this but when finding QB why can we not use one of the boards on the left or right? Why the center board?
 
Raeksis said:
Sorry to bump this but when finding QB why can we not use one of the boards on the left or right? Why the center board?
You can do it that way and get the same result without having to divide by 2 when you use the center board, because now there is just one shear plane instead of 2 when using the first method.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can do it that way and get the same result without having to divide by 2 when you use the center board, because now there is just one shear plane instead of 2 when using the first method.
But I was thinking that only works here because the boards are the same dimensions.

In a question like this below (b), if I use one of the side boards I get a different (wrong) answer than if I use the center board.

Two U-shaped wooden built-up beam cross-sections, (a) and (b), each with a downward shear force V on the top flange. Labels b, a, c, d and e give the dimensions; (a) has two nails through the flange into the legs, and (b) has two nails through the sides of the top flange.
 
Raeksis said:
But I was thinking that only works here because the boards are the same dimensions.

In a question like this below (b), if I use one of the side boards I get a different (wrong) answer than if I use the center board.

View attachment 196206
Part b is a bit more tricky than part a because in part b, the longitudinal shear flow across the nail is into the plane of the page (z direction) on the yz side face of a cubic element, in contrast to part a where the longitudinal shear flow across the nail is into the plane of the page (z direction) on the xz top face of a cubic element. Consequently, in part b, the shear flow is horizontally distributed across the top board, so you need to find Q based on the area of the board in between the nailed joints, and the vertical distance from its centroid to the neutral axis. Then divide result by 2 when determining shear flow, because there are 2 shear planes.
Alternatively, you could use the Q of the area outside of the top cuts, but when so doing, you must use the full area , that is, the area of both vertical pieces times the vertical distance of its centroid to the neutral axis. This a more tedious way of finding it.
Part b is a stronger connection than part a, because the Q in part b is less.