Why Does the Osculating Circle Formula Involve Derivatives?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ele38
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Formula
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 4K views
Ele38
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!
I learned yesterday what an osculating circle is and I am learning how to find the radius of curvature of some curves. For example I have found that for y=x^2 the radius of the osculating circle for the point [0,0] is 0.5 (That's why circular mirror works similarly to parabolic mirror, with the focus equal to radius/2, right?)
I found that result using non standard analysis, but I know that there is a formula that is used to find the radius of curvature.
\frac{(1+y'^2(x))^{3/2}}{|y''(x)|}
What I can figure out is why this formula can calcuate the radius, i do not understand why there are the first and the second derivatives of the function. Do you know how to demonstrate this formula?

Thanks,
Ele38
 

Discussion

Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that radius is defined for circles. The notion of "radius of curvature" for a general curve has to be defined. As you might expect, the greater the concavity of a curve, the quicker it is turning, much as a circle with a small radius turns sharply. Since concavity is tied to the second derivative, it is not surprising that the notion of radius of curvature involves first and second derivatives. Once you have that notion defined, the osculating circle is the circle that best fits the curve at a point. Google osculating circle to find more details and some nice animations.
 
Thank you, I did not think about concavity. What is "obscure" to me is what doest "circle that best fits the curve at a point" means in math language...