Why does the square of the amplitude of a wave function represent P?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Born's postulate in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing why the square of the amplitude of a wave function, represented as ψ*ψ, corresponds to the probability of locating a particle at a specific point. The scope includes theoretical implications and foundational concepts in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Born's postulate indicates the probability of finding a particle at a point is given by ψ*ψ, questioning the underlying mechanics of this relationship.
  • Others argue that while various motivations for Born's postulate exist, it cannot be derived in a non-circular manner, suggesting it is fundamentally a postulate of quantum mechanics.
  • A participant mentions that there are advanced derivations of the postulate, indicating that a deeper understanding may be possible but may not be accessible to those still learning quantum mechanics.
  • One participant references a related thread for further exploration of the topic, indicating that there are additional resources available for those interested.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation and acceptance of Born's postulate, with no consensus reached on whether it can be derived or should be accepted as a fundamental postulate.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving Born's postulate and the potential limitations in understanding it without advanced knowledge of quantum mechanics.

Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Born's postulate suggests if a particle is described a wave function ψ(r,t) the probability of finding the particle at a certain point is ψ*ψ. How does this work and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It’s simply a postulate of quantum mechanics, you can motivate it based on various arguments but it cannot really be derived from anything in a non-circular manner.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Haynes Kwon said:
Born's postulate suggests if a particle is described a wave function ψ(r,t) the probability of finding the particle at a certain point is ψ*ψ. How does this work and why?
It can be derived to a certain degree, but the most general such derivations are quite advanced. If you're still learning QM it is best to accept it as a postulate.

A derivation of it is basically if you acknowledge nature can have discrete outcomes in certain experiments with those outcomes having a certain algebraic relation to each other you can derive that all probabilities must come from a specific operator ##\rho## with the wavefunction being a sort of special case (pure state). See the thread @Mentz114 mentioned as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K