Why Does the Toroid's Magnetic Field Equation Use a Cubed Distance Term?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the magnetic field of a toroid, specifically focusing on the derivation of the equation that includes a cubed distance term. Participants are examining the transition from the Biot-Savart law to the equation presented in Griffith's textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the cubed term in the magnetic field equation, with some suggesting it may be an error in the text. They are exploring the implications of this term on the dimensional consistency of the equation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the equation's components, with some participants expressing agreement on the potential mistake in the text. The discussion is focused on clarifying the assumptions behind the equation and the reasoning for the cubed term.

Contextual Notes

Participants are referencing a specific textbook and its equations, indicating a reliance on the material for their understanding. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the provided equations, which may affect the interpretation of the magnetic field's behavior.

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working through a proof that says the magnetic field of a toroid is circumferential at all points inside and outside the toroid. I can follow most of the proof, but am a bit confused where the first equation comes from.

Here is the figure from the textbook (Griffith's 4th Ed).

http://media.newschoolers.com/uploads/images/17/00/67/76/17/677617.jpeg

To begin the proof, Griffiths starts with the field at \mathbf{r} due to the current element at \mathbf{r}'.d\mathbf{B}=\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\frac{\mathbf{I}\times\mathbf{\hat{{u}}}}{u^3}dl'

Homework Equations



\mathbf{B}=\frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\int\frac{\mathbf{I}\times\mathbf{\hat{u}}}{u^2}dl'

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just confused at how Griffiths got from the Biot-Savart law above, into the equation he posted in the question. (I replaced the script r with a u). Where does the cubed term come from?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that is a mistake in the text. I think he meant it to be the vector r and not r hat, in which case the denominator would be cubed.
 
I agree with post #2. Otherwise the dimensions don't check out.
 
cool thanks. I was thinking that, but I wanted to confirm!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K