Why Does Water Soak Through Mugs?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Identity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the phenomenon of liquid rings forming under mugs after pouring beverages, particularly coffee and tea. Participants concluded that the primary cause is not absorption through the ceramic but rather condensation and potential moisture trapped in the porous base of the mug. Tests revealed that hot water tends to create a ring due to evaporation and condensation, while cold water does not. The importance of the mug's glaze and its condition was emphasized, as a poor glaze can lead to water absorption and subsequent liquid rings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ceramic materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of condensation and evaporation processes
  • Familiarity with the effects of temperature on materials
  • Basic experimental design for testing hypotheses
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of ceramic glazes and their impact on permeability
  • Investigate the science of condensation and evaporation in relation to temperature changes
  • Conduct experiments on different mug materials to observe liquid ring formation
  • Explore the effects of moisture retention in porous materials
USEFUL FOR

Ceramicists, physicists, engineers, and anyone interested in the science of materials and their interactions with liquids.

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
When I pour a liquid into a mug, after a while of sitting, there will usually be a ring of liquid around where the mug has been in contact with the table. Assuming I haven't spilt any liquid, how does this occur? I'm sure this is a quite common phenomenon... are mugs simply not as 'solid' as they appear, or is something else at work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It never happens with my mugs, unless they are already wet. I am thinking about coffee or tea mugs, that are warm.
If you have in mind a glass of beer then it makes sense.
If you pour cold beer in the container, the water vapors could condensate on the mug and then slowly drip down towards the base of the "mug".
 
I have observed this on a number of occasions but don't know the explanation. My assumption was that some sort of absorption occurs initially and at some saturation point the mug stops taking on water and remains waterproof. I do find it weird that the water can absorb so far but not actually all the way through to the other side. I would like to hear the actual reason for it if anybody knows about the properties of ceramic in terms of water permeability.
 
A glazed mug (as most are) is waterproof. No water is absorbed into the mug itself. That is one of the purposes of glazing.
 
It also is not uncommon that when we drink from a mug, not all goes into our mouth.
Some is left on the rim of the cup, some dribbles on the side.
From my own observation, I have never seen a carefully poured cup of coffee leave a ring on a table that has not been sipped from.
As noted from someone else, a cold beverage can certainly condense moisture in the air on the outside and eventually drip down.
 
Condensation?
 
JesusInACan said:
Condensation?

From?

Consider what causes condensation and why you won't get it on a mug of coffee.
 
ok but you could get condensation from a cold glass of ice water.
 
cragar said:
ok but you could get condensation from a cold glass of ice water.

I've never said you couldn't.

I specifically asked about coffee, because the issue happens with both hot and cold beverages. Condensation may explain it for cold, but then what about hot?
 
  • #10
I've never seen this happen before. Can you take pictures? Does this happen when the liquid is at room temp?
 
  • #11
Topher925 said:
I've never seen this happen before. Can you take pictures? Does this happen when the liquid is at room temp?

It's usually when some liquid spills down the side of the mug, collects around the 'ring' at the bottom, so when you pick it up there's a ring left on the surface.

Google: coffee ring (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=e...&q=coffee+ring&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=)

EDIT: Note the fact that in those images you can clearly see the point at which the spill (or point of run down from mug) occurred.
 
  • #12
I should be clear that when I see it happen, it's not spillage from pouring, and I do not even see the rim of liquid underneath the cup - it is a liquid level drop inside the mug only. I figured that both observations could have same root cause (i.e. something to do with permeability)
I pour in the boiling water, and then over the span of about 5 or 10 seconds, the level appears to drop. I don't know if it's an illusion or if something more interesting is happening. I don't see it every time

Incidentally, there is nothing stopping steam condensing on inside of mug before the mug reaches a high temperature, but that is of course irrelevant :-)
 
  • #13
I get this 'change of level' effect when pouring water over ground coffee in a cafetier but I think that's because the water takes a while to soak into the grounds.
Try your experiment with several different types of mug - including glass.
Perhaps your experimental mug has a poor glaze on the outside of the base. Perhaps it has wear on the bottom rim and can actually absorb water into its core whilst it is being washed. When you put hot water in the mug, this water will evaporate and condense on the cooler table top - making it look like water has come from inside the mug, whereas it's actually come from the porous pot core.
The reduced level of the liquid inside may be an illusion.
 
  • #14
sophiecentaur said:
Perhaps your experimental mug has a poor glaze on the outside of the base. Perhaps it has wear on the bottom rim and can actually absorb water into its core whilst it is being washed. When you put hot water in the mug, this water will evaporate and condense on the cooler table top - making it look like water has come from inside the mug, whereas it's actually come from the porous pot core.

I like this thinking.

(with regards to the level change thing, I will have to pay more attention when it next happens as your coffee example has got me thinking that it's something simple like dehydrated coffee granules causing the effect… duh!)
 
  • #15
Try baking your mug in an oven at low temperature for an hour or so, then let it cool in a dry place. Repeat the experiment and let me know the result. We may have cracked it - the problem but not necessarily the mug.
 
  • #16
I have run a couple of basic tests:

TEST 1
Cup completely emmersed in water
Cup WIPED dry
Cup filled with HOT water
RESULT: water ring after 10 seconds

TEST 2
Cup emmersed in water
Cup WIPED dry
Cup filled with COLD water
RESULT: no water ring after 5 minutes

I am going to try the cup dehydration exercise tonight, and repeat the above two tests - my wife already thinks I am weird so no problem doing that

Incidentally, my colleague sat next to me is into pottery and she mentioned that the glaze is wiped from the contact patch before baking to prevent it sticking to the kiln floor, and I checked my cup and right enough the contact patch / ring is porous and glaze free!

Tonights experiments will confirm things either way, but I think you are correct Sophie :-)
 
  • #17
Wives tend to be like that. Mine has completely given up on me about this sort of thing.
Good luck.
 
  • #18
Molydood said:
it is a liquid level drop inside the mug only. I figured that both observations could have same root cause (i.e. something to do with permeability)
I pour in the boiling water, and then over the span of about 5 or 10 seconds, the level appears to drop. I don't know if it's an illusion or if something more interesting is happening. I don't see it every time

Sounds like an illusion.

I'll throw this in anyway: evaporation?
 
  • #19
Evaporation at what rate?
If you could notice a change of level due to evaporation then the temperature of the coffee would have dropped to undrinkable.
 
  • #20
Molydood said:
TEST 1
Cup completely emmersed in water
Cup WIPED dry
Cup filled with HOT water
RESULT: water ring after 10 seconds

TEST 2
Cup emmersed in water
Cup WIPED dry
Cup filled with COLD water
RESULT: no water ring after 5 minutes

Now what does cold do to a material and what does heat do to a material?
 
  • #21
sophiecentaur said:
Evaporation at what rate?
If you could notice a change of level due to evaporation then the temperature of the coffee would have dropped to undrinkable.

When I wrote it I hadn't read the 5 or 10 second thing, I thought it was over a long period (say 30 minutes) of cooling.
 
  • #22
If you're going to get involved with cutting edge Science you really will have to pay attention, you know.:smile:
 
  • #23
sophiecentaur said:
If you're going to get involved with cutting edge Science you really will have to pay attention, you know.:smile:

I'm an engineer, not a scientist. :wink:
 
  • #24
Molydood said:
I have run a couple of basic tests:

TEST 1
Cup completely emmersed in water
Cup WIPED dry
Cup filled with HOT water
RESULT: water ring after 10 seconds

TEST 2
Cup emmersed in water
Cup WIPED dry
Cup filled with COLD water
RESULT: no water ring after 5 minutes

I am going to try the cup dehydration exercise tonight, and repeat the above two tests - my wife already thinks I am weird so no problem doing that

Incidentally, my colleague sat next to me is into pottery and she mentioned that the glaze is wiped from the contact patch before baking to prevent it sticking to the kiln floor, and I checked my cup and right enough the contact patch / ring is porous and glaze free!

Tonights experiments will confirm things either way, but I think you are correct Sophie :-)

What is the mug made of? I am sorry if you already said this. I did not see it.

Anyway, does the mug have any porosity? I don't mean pores that go trough, just surface pores. It may be that some water is absorbed in the pores and stays there even when you wiped it. If the pores are small enough (but not too small), some air may be trapped in the pores, behind the water. Heating the mug expands the air in the pores and it pushes the water out.
If this is the case, and if you try it after the mug was sitting for a while (or backing it, as someone else suggested) without dipping it in water before, you should not get the ring.
 
  • #25
@jarednjames
Clearly the last post was also from an engineer!

We've been there already nasu. :smile:
 
  • #26
@sophiecentaur
Sorry, now I've found your post on the previous page.
So this scenario was eliminated based on Molydood's observation that the level of the liquid drops. The OP himself seems to have lost interest, he did not give any details.

@Molydood
Still, what is the mug made of? It is some ceramic (maybe home made?) as I would guess from some your posts?
 
  • #27
I don't think this is revealing any magic or Science - just wet pottery.
 
  • #28
Just to be clear, I think we have two unrelated effects that have been observed by different people
The 'level drop' observation is one effect and I suspect (in my case) it was observed when making coffee from dehydrated granules, which is likely to be the simple explanation
The 'liquid ring' observation is another effect and I suspect simply water trapped in base as already suggested above

I tried testing it out last night, but my wife would not let me put the cups in the oven (tsk) so all I could do was take mugs from the cupboard and hope that they had minimal water content in the base. Unfortunately, I could not generate liquid rings under the cups at all, no matter what I did
This morning, I tried using my cup in work, which was creating the effect quite reliably yesterday, thinking that the cup could have 'dried' overnight…. but now I can't generate liquid rings at all.

So it remains a bit of a mystery to me :-)
 
  • #29
@nasu, not sure on material, its just an off-the-shelf mug

an interesting side note however, is that the mug was actually a gift from the from the aforementioned "don't put my good mugs in the oven" wife - it has a periodic table printed on the side and it came from the Science Museum in London - so perhaps I should pay the museum a visit and ask them why their mugs produce inconsistent experimental results ;-)
 
  • #30
My guess is that the air trapped under the mug and close around it is warmed up, thus can absorb more moisture. Once the humid air comes in contact with the colder table, condensation ensues. You can actually see it happening through a transparent (eg. glass) surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K