Why doesn't a weak acid/base act as a buffer on its own?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sungholee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Act Buffer Weak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A weak acid cannot act as a buffer on its own due to its inability to effectively neutralize added H+ ions once its conjugate base (A-) is depleted. When H+ is added, it reacts with A- to form HA, but without sufficient A-, the weak acid fails to maintain pH stability. Buffer capacity, which is highest at pH=pKa, is crucial for effective buffering, and percent ionization decreases with increased concentration of weak acids, further complicating their buffering ability. A mixture of a weak acid and its conjugate base is essential for optimal buffering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak acid and conjugate base equilibrium
  • Familiarity with Le Chatelier's principle
  • Knowledge of buffer capacity and its significance
  • Concept of percent ionization in weak acids
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation for buffer solutions
  • Explore the concept of buffer capacity in detail
  • Investigate the effects of concentration on percent ionization in weak acids
  • Learn about strong vs. weak acids and their dissociation behaviors
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding acid-base chemistry and buffer systems.

sungholee
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am a high school level student and I had a question about weak acids/bases and why they wouldn't work as a buffer on its own.

If the dissociation of a weak acid is HA \rightleftharpoons H^{+} + A^{-}, then when we add OH^{-}, it will react with the H^{+} to form water. Because the concentration of the products had been decreased, more HA will dissociate. It's very simple for me upto this point.

But the problem is when we add H^{+}, it will react with the A^{-} to form HA. Then, according to Le Chatelier's principle, wouldn't the HA dissociate, because its concentration is greater than the products? What I have been told is that now no more H^{+} can be neutralized because all of the A^{-} have been used up, and that's why we need a salt of the acid, to provide that A^{-}. However, I fail to see why the A^{-} would work differently to H^{+}.

Of course, I can pretend I understand it and simply memorise it, but I'll be studying chem in uni so I want to have a strong understanding of the basics.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi, are you asking for example why a weak acid alone would not act as a buffer? ...As opposed to the typical buffer being a weak acid and conjugate base mixture?
 
In essence, yes I am.
 
It is a matter of how effective a solution is at maintaining the constant pH. If it resist pH changes we call it a buffer, when it doesn't - we don't. Resistance to pH changes is called a buffer capacity. And it is highest for pH=pKa, goes down the further from the pKa we are.

See derivation and plot here: buffer capacity.
 
Well, you can't really have a weak acid by itself, as far as I know. It will always partially dissociate into its conjugate base, reaching equilibrium. This is in contrast with a strong acid, which dissociates essentially completely.

I think maybe more related to what you are asking though is something called percent ionization. This is a simple ratio of the concentration of H+ over the concentration of HA (expressed as a percent). Weak acids have small percent ionizations, for example 0.2 M HNO3 would only have a percent ionization of about 4.8% (so like 5 molecules out of 100 dissociate).

Now maybe sort of an unintuitive thing happens, when you increase the concentration of a weak acid, the percent ionization actually decreases. In other words a smaller fraction of the weak acid molecules dissociate. So like a 2.5 M HNO3 solution has a percent ionization of 1.4% (now only like 1 out of 100 dissociate). (I am just getting these vaules from a text) Its still the case that the concentration of H+ is greater for the higher molarity, but the (percent) amount of dissociation that occurs is less.

So in other words the dissociation of HA isn't a linear relationship with concentration, as (if I am reading you right) you might be thinking.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K