Why doesn't the Moon fall to Earth despite gravitational attraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tianyi.tan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around gravitational interactions, specifically why the Moon does not fall to Earth despite the gravitational attraction between them. Participants also explore the implications of releasing the Earth and Moon from rest and the dynamics of neutron stars in relation to centripetal acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the concept of orbits and the balance between gravitational attraction and tangential velocity. Questions are raised about the conditions under which the Moon would fall to Earth or maintain an orbit. Additionally, there is inquiry into the application of centripetal acceleration in the context of neutron stars and the conditions for matter to remain on their surface.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of orbital motion and the role of tangential velocity. Others are seeking clarification on specific concepts and equations related to centripetal acceleration and gravitational forces, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topics.

Contextual Notes

There is a repeated emphasis on understanding the dynamics of gravitational forces and motion, with participants expressing confusion about specific aspects of the problems presented. The discussion includes assumptions about the initial conditions of the Earth-Moon system and the properties of neutron stars.

tianyi.tan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.. some stuff from my tutorial I'm confused about, pls help! thanks:)
1) Why does the moon not fall and hit the earth? Since both exert attractive forces on each other, there should be some kind of acceleration towards a common point.. ><
2)When the Earth and moon are held at rest at their present separation and released to move, would the moon orbit the earth? Or would it then fall to the earth?
3) "Despite its mass and size, a typical neutron star can rotate about its own axis at a high speed. What is the fastest rate of rotation of a neutron star such that matter still remains at its surface? Assume that the radius of the neutron star is 20.0km & its mass is 3.98 x 10^30kg." What concepts should I use to solve this problem? thanks :D:D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. They are constantly falling (being accelerated) toward each other. But they are also moving sideways wrt each other - fast enough that they never hit each other. That's what an orbit is.

2. If they had no tangential velocity, they would fall straight together like a ball dropped straight down from your hand. But they have a tangential velocity, like a ball thrown sideways with respect to the earth.

3. Are these homework? Did you learn about centripedal acceleration yet? There is an equation for it...
 
hi, thanks so much!
regarding (3), yupp I have learned about centripetal acceleration, but I'm not sure what they mean by the matter staying on the surface. Am I supposed to equate v2/r to the gravitational field strength? :S
 
tianyi.tan said:
Hello.. some stuff from my tutorial I'm confused about, pls help! thanks:)
1) Why does the moon not fall and hit the earth? Since both exert attractive forces on each other, there should be some kind of acceleration towards a common point.. ><
2)When the Earth and moon are held at rest at their present separation and released to move, would the moon orbit the earth? Or would it then fall to the earth?
3) "Despite its mass and size, a typical neutron star can rotate about its own axis at a high speed. What is the fastest rate of rotation of a neutron star such that matter still remains at its surface? Assume that the radius of the neutron star is 20.0km & its mass is 3.98 x 10^30kg." What concepts should I use to solve this problem? thanks :D:D

1. The force of attraction is perpendicular to the velocity of the moon's orbit - ie the moon is traveling tangential to the orbit, assuming a circular orbit. Thus there is no component of the force in the direction of motion. The force remains perpendicular to the motion as it moves so it simply changes the direction of the moon's motion. This is an example of uniform circular motion. The acceleration is always directed towards the centre of the Earth (approximately) no matter where the moon is.

2. In this case the moon would move straight towards the Earth because it does not have an initial motion perpendicular to the gravitational force.

3. We know
a=\frac{GM}{r} (Newton's Law of Gravitation)

and a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} (centripetal acceleration)

thus

\frac{Gm}{r^{2}} = \frac{v^{2}}{r}

v= \sqrt{\frac{Gm}{r}} gives the tangential speed of the particles

= \sqrt{\frac{6.67e-11*3.98e30}{20e3}}

= 1.152 *10^8 m/s

This is the tangential speed of the outer particles, assuming the star's mass is concentrated at its centre.

Circumfrence = 2pir = 1.257 * 10^5m

Thus 1.152 *10^8/1.257 * 10^5 = 917 revolutions per second required.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K