Why doesn't this solution work? (Springs and Conservation of Energy)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of conservation of energy in analyzing trampoline dynamics, specifically using the equation $$mgh_0 + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ to derive initial velocity and spring compression. The correct formulation for height change during trampoline compression is $$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mg(h_1+x_1) + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$, which accounts for both the height of the jump and the compression of the spring. The discussion highlights the misconception that acceleration remains constant during the trampoline's compression, clarifying that the force exerted by the spring increases as it stretches, leading to variable acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of spring mechanics, specifically Hooke's Law (F = -kx)
  • Introduction to simple harmonic motion concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in variable force scenarios
  • Explore the principles of simple harmonic motion and its mathematical modeling
  • Investigate the quadratic formula and its applications in solving physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students beginning their studies in physics, particularly those interested in mechanics and energy transfer, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to springs and motion dynamics.

CCoffman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 67 kg trampoline artist jumps vertically upward from the top of a platform with a speed of 4.7 m/s from a height of 2.0 meters. If the trampoline behaves like a spring of spring constant ##5.8×10^4## N/m , what is the distance he depress it?
Relevant Equations
##U_i + K_i + \text{[Other initial energies] =} U_f + K_f + \text{[Other final energies], }F = kx##
I already know the solution to this, all you do is set the height of the top of the trampoline to 0 and solve for initial velocity so the equation for the conservation of energy $$mgh_0 + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ becomes $$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ All we do is solve for the initial velocity using a kinematic equation and then find the distance the spring/trampoline is depressed using the quadratic formula, giving us x = -.28 meters.

On my first attempt i tried to take the simpler rout of using $$F = kx$$ $$ma = kx$$ $$\frac{67*-9.8}{5.8*10^4} = -.011$$ I am wondering why this is incorrect. The acceleration should stay the same, at least the initial acceleration before the energy is transferred to the spring. I am sorry if this is a dumb question, i just started physics and... i don't understand anything :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CCoffman said:
I am wondering why this is incorrect.
That will just give you that the spring would compress 1.1 cm when the person is standing still on the trampoline.
 
CCoffman said:
$$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$
This should be
##\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mg(h_1+x_1) + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2##
because the total height-change is ##h_1+ x_1##. But doing this makes only a small difference to the answer if ##x_1 \ll h_1##; also it means you would need to solve a more complicated quadratic equation.

CCoffman said:
The acceleration should stay the same, at least the initial acceleration before the energy is transferred to the spring.
No. Constant acceleration requires a constant force (F=ma). The acceleration is not constant while the trampoline (spring) is being stretched.

That's because the upwards force from the trampoline increases the more it is stretched (F = -kx and x is changing).

The trampoliner, while in contact with the trampoline, is comparable to a mass hanging on a spring in simple harmonic motion if you have met this before. A bit of calculus is needed for this ‘force method’.

CCoffman said:
Im sorry if this is a dumb question,
It's not a dumb question. And trying to check the consistency of two different methods to solve the same problem is an excellent learning technique.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
938
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K