Why doesn't this solution work? (Springs and Conservation of Energy)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of conservation of energy in analyzing a trampoline's mechanics. The initial approach to find the initial velocity using energy equations is contrasted with a force-based method, which incorrectly assumes constant acceleration. It is clarified that the force exerted by the trampoline increases as it stretches, leading to variable acceleration. The correct energy equation should account for the total height change, combining both the height of the trampoline and its compression. The conversation emphasizes that questioning methods is a valuable part of learning physics.
CCoffman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 67 kg trampoline artist jumps vertically upward from the top of a platform with a speed of 4.7 m/s from a height of 2.0 meters. If the trampoline behaves like a spring of spring constant ##5.8×10^4## N/m , what is the distance he depress it?
Relevant Equations
##U_i + K_i + \text{[Other initial energies] =} U_f + K_f + \text{[Other final energies], }F = kx##
I already know the solution to this, all you do is set the height of the top of the trampoline to 0 and solve for initial velocity so the equation for the conservation of energy $$mgh_0 + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ becomes $$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ All we do is solve for the initial velocity using a kinematic equation and then find the distance the spring/trampoline is depressed using the quadratic formula, giving us x = -.28 meters.

On my first attempt i tried to take the simpler rout of using $$F = kx$$ $$ma = kx$$ $$\frac{67*-9.8}{5.8*10^4} = -.011$$ I am wondering why this is incorrect. The acceleration should stay the same, at least the initial acceleration before the energy is transferred to the spring. I am sorry if this is a dumb question, i just started physics and... i don't understand anything :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CCoffman said:
I am wondering why this is incorrect.
That will just give you that the spring would compress 1.1 cm when the person is standing still on the trampoline.
 
CCoffman said:
$$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$
This should be
##\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mg(h_1+x_1) + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2##
because the total height-change is ##h_1+ x_1##. But doing this makes only a small difference to the answer if ##x_1 \ll h_1##; also it means you would need to solve a more complicated quadratic equation.

CCoffman said:
The acceleration should stay the same, at least the initial acceleration before the energy is transferred to the spring.
No. Constant acceleration requires a constant force (F=ma). The acceleration is not constant while the trampoline (spring) is being stretched.

That's because the upwards force from the trampoline increases the more it is stretched (F = -kx and x is changing).

The trampoliner, while in contact with the trampoline, is comparable to a mass hanging on a spring in simple harmonic motion if you have met this before. A bit of calculus is needed for this ‘force method’.

CCoffman said:
Im sorry if this is a dumb question,
It's not a dumb question. And trying to check the consistency of two different methods to solve the same problem is an excellent learning technique.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top