Why doesn't this solution work? (Springs and Conservation of Energy)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of conservation of energy in analyzing a trampoline's mechanics. The initial approach to find the initial velocity using energy equations is contrasted with a force-based method, which incorrectly assumes constant acceleration. It is clarified that the force exerted by the trampoline increases as it stretches, leading to variable acceleration. The correct energy equation should account for the total height change, combining both the height of the trampoline and its compression. The conversation emphasizes that questioning methods is a valuable part of learning physics.
CCoffman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 67 kg trampoline artist jumps vertically upward from the top of a platform with a speed of 4.7 m/s from a height of 2.0 meters. If the trampoline behaves like a spring of spring constant ##5.8×10^4## N/m , what is the distance he depress it?
Relevant Equations
##U_i + K_i + \text{[Other initial energies] =} U_f + K_f + \text{[Other final energies], }F = kx##
I already know the solution to this, all you do is set the height of the top of the trampoline to 0 and solve for initial velocity so the equation for the conservation of energy $$mgh_0 + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ becomes $$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$ All we do is solve for the initial velocity using a kinematic equation and then find the distance the spring/trampoline is depressed using the quadratic formula, giving us x = -.28 meters.

On my first attempt i tried to take the simpler rout of using $$F = kx$$ $$ma = kx$$ $$\frac{67*-9.8}{5.8*10^4} = -.011$$ I am wondering why this is incorrect. The acceleration should stay the same, at least the initial acceleration before the energy is transferred to the spring. I am sorry if this is a dumb question, i just started physics and... i don't understand anything :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CCoffman said:
I am wondering why this is incorrect.
That will just give you that the spring would compress 1.1 cm when the person is standing still on the trampoline.
 
CCoffman said:
$$\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mgh_1 + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2$$
This should be
##\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = mg(h_1+x_1) + \frac{1}{2}kx_1^2##
because the total height-change is ##h_1+ x_1##. But doing this makes only a small difference to the answer if ##x_1 \ll h_1##; also it means you would need to solve a more complicated quadratic equation.

CCoffman said:
The acceleration should stay the same, at least the initial acceleration before the energy is transferred to the spring.
No. Constant acceleration requires a constant force (F=ma). The acceleration is not constant while the trampoline (spring) is being stretched.

That's because the upwards force from the trampoline increases the more it is stretched (F = -kx and x is changing).

The trampoliner, while in contact with the trampoline, is comparable to a mass hanging on a spring in simple harmonic motion if you have met this before. A bit of calculus is needed for this ‘force method’.

CCoffman said:
Im sorry if this is a dumb question,
It's not a dumb question. And trying to check the consistency of two different methods to solve the same problem is an excellent learning technique.
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
865
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K