Why Doesn't Total Mechanical Work Equal the Sum of All Work Values?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between total mechanical work and the sum of work values in a physics context. The net work done on a system, calculated as Wnet = ΔK, is determined to be 18J, derived from the positive area of 24J and the negative area of -6J. The confusion arises from the total area under the curve, which sums to 30J, but does not represent the net work due to the negative contributions. The key takeaway is that total mechanical work accounts for directionality, while the total area under the curve aggregates all contributions without regard for sign.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle in physics
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of piecewise functions and their integration
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of work
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about piecewise linear functions and their applications in physics
  • Explore integration techniques for calculating areas under curves
  • Investigate the implications of positive and negative work in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, educators teaching the work-energy principle, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of physical work calculations.

scuroangel66
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright we just learned about work in our physics class and I've met with my professor to try and help me understand the concept better. Here is my question, how much mechanical work is done. The best example would be the diagram I attached. Each block on the graph is 1 unit by 1 unit. I understand total displacement of work gives you your change in K, from the formula Wnet=[tex]\DeltaK[/tex]
The positive area of the graph equals 24J and the negative area of the graph is equal to -6J, so the [tex]\DeltaK[/tex]=18J That means the work done overall on the system by the force is equal to 18J. But what I don't understand is why he says the object doesn't undergo a total of 30J. Because from x=0 to x=8 the object undergoes 24J and from x=8 to x=12 the object undergoes 6J in the opposite direction. So although the Total Mechanical Work of the system equals 18J, why can't you state the fact that the object underwent a Total Mechanical Work of 30J. I hope I made my thoughts clear. Any help would be great. One other thing I was just thinking was because to find the total are in calculus of an integral, you add the positive and subtract the negative, therefore adding it, giving you 30J from x=0 to x=12. So is there a difference between total displacement (18J of total work of the system) and total area under the curve (30J of work that has been applied to the object between x=0 and x=12)?!?
 

Attachments

  • p5-55alt.gif
    p5-55alt.gif
    3.7 KB · Views: 464
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, there was an error it should read...

Wnet=[tex]\Delta[/tex]K

The positive area of the graph equals 24J and the negative area of the graph is equal to -6J, so the [tex]\Delta[/tex]K=18J
 
An integration example: If you integrate the function f(x) = sin x from 0 to Pi you'll get 2. Integrating from Pi to 2Pi gives -2. The total is 0.
Integral[sin x] from 0 to 2Pi = 0. The area under the x-axis is negative in sign so quantities like work that depend on totaling the area are algebraically added.

If you specified your graph as four piecewise linear functions of x with domains a<=x<=b:


Code:
Function:              Domain:          Integrating the function from a to b: 
f1[x] = 6x/4           a=0,   b=4       12
f2[x] = -6x/4 + 12     a=4,   b=8       12
f3[x] = -6x/4 + 12     a=8,   b=10      -3
f4[x] = 6x/4 - 18      a=10,  b=12      -3

Total work: (Integral[f1], 0 to 4 ) + (Integral[f2], 4 to 8) + (Integral[f3], 8 to 10) + Integral[f4], 10 to 12) = 18
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K