Why Don't Electrons Replace Protons in MRI Imaging?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dangus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Mri
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the reasons why electrons are not used in MRI imaging despite their stronger magnetic fields compared to protons. Participants explore the physics of magnetic resonance, the feasibility of generating RF pulses at different frequencies, and the implications of using electrons versus protons in imaging techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that MRI primarily uses protons in hydrogen atoms because they can be flipped with radio frequencies that are practical for imaging, while electron resonance frequencies are much higher.
  • Others argue that the energy required to flip electron spins is in the microwave range, making it less feasible for MRI applications.
  • A participant questions how the resonance frequencies are calculated, suggesting that electrons might be easier to flip due to their lower mass.
  • Some contributions highlight that while electrons have a stronger magnetic moment, this could complicate imaging due to issues like signal processing and penetration of microwaves in biological tissues.
  • One participant emphasizes the complexity of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) compared to electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), suggesting that NMR provides richer information due to interactions with neighboring spins.
  • Another participant mentions that EPR imaging is primarily used for small animals and specific applications, indicating that it has its own niche in research.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of using electrons in MRI, including the potential for heating biological tissues and the challenges of signal processing at higher frequencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and practicality of using electrons in MRI imaging. There is no consensus on whether the advantages of using electrons outweigh the challenges presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of resonance frequencies, the complexity of signal processing in MRI, and the unresolved nature of how well EPR could serve medical imaging needs compared to established MRI techniques.

  • #31
I think his confusion stems from the fact that precession direction doesn't change, unlike in the car analogy. But the thing is, if you flip the track, along with the cars, and have cars keep driving in the same direction, it's the same thing as if the cars turned around. That's a bit closer to what the 180° pulse does.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hmm, even that's not quite the best picture. Remember that the slowest car (spin) must end up closest to the finish line after the flip...
I think the wiki cartoon shows it clearly.
 
  • #33
K^2 said:
I think his confusion stems from the fact that precession direction doesn't change, unlike in the car analogy. But the thing is, if you flip the track, along with the cars, and have cars keep driving in the same direction, it's the same thing as if the cars turned around. That's a bit closer to what the 180° pulse does.

Correct. That was my confusion. After drawing some pictures and staring at it for a bit I see it now. The analogy of flipping the track around was actually quite helpful.

Thank you
 
  • #34
I talked to an actual NMR theorist about all this. He set me straight on some off the issues. While my understanding of T2 contrast wasn't far off, the thing I overlooked with EPR is the frequencies. Basically, molecular movement that's relevant to T2 in NMR is irrelevant in EPR. So EPR T2 contrast is going to be effectively useless.

T1 contrast in EPR will give you some information about the tissues, and it might or might not be useful, but it would be different from information you'd get from T1 using NMR. Again, different frequencies mean that lattice relaxation happens due to completely different vibrational modes.

So marcusl was absolutely correct. As far as medical imaging goes, EPR wouldn't be able to replace NMR.
 
  • #35
Thanks for the new information, K^2. It's nice to know the reasons behind the differences.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Spin alignment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Are Quantum Processes Responsible for Brain Functions and Consciousness?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
High School Generator stator: Copper wire or copper sheets?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Undergrad Fundamental - Magnetic fields generated by moving electrons
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Graduate Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES)
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Frequency encoding gradient in MRI
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
How to explain the Quantum Mechanics/Math of the stages of MRI imaging
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad Magnetic field lines around electron and wire seem to contradict
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Why are MRI machines so expensive to operate?
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
9K