Why don't y=x and y=x²+1 intersect?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I had a thought while doing some calculus last night and it now concerns me that for some reason I cannot answer it. If given the equations [tex]y=x[/tex] and [tex]y=x^2+1[/tex] it would appear that since the range of the latter "reaches" infinity "first" that these two curves never meet. Now that thought did not occur to me until I sketched them after I tried solving them as a system of equations.

Is there some way (not intuitively, but abstractly) to see that these two curves never intersect?

Thanks,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These two equations specifically, sure. x2+1=x obviously has no solutions in the reals.

Any system of equations, obviously not. There is no general solution for finding the zeros of a quintic, let alone any arbitrary function.
 
I am not interested in finding any zeros; I am interested in knowing if there is a way to determine that there are not any zeros.

Casey
 
Look at f(x)= x2+1- x. f'(x)= 2x- 1 which is positive for x> 1/2 so it is always increasing. When x= 1/2, that has a value of 1/4+ 1- 1/2= 3/4. As long as there is no zero between 0 and 1/2, the function cannot have a zero and so the equation
x2+ 1= x cannot have a solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is no general method to determine whether some function [itex]f(x)[/itex] has any zeroes. Suppose you evaluate the function at two points, [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. If the function value is positive at both points (or negative at both points), there might well be no points or two points or four points (or ...) between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] where the function is zero. (Note: In saying this I am counting double zeros such as x2=0 as two zeros). You don't know which is the case and there is no general way of knowing.

Suppose you get lucky and find that [itex]f(x_1)[/itex] and [itex]f(x_2)[/itex] have opposite signs. You still don't know that the function passes through zero between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. Consider [itex]f(x)=1/x[/itex] for example. [itex]f(-2)=-1/2[/itex] and [itex]f(1)=1[/itex], but the function does not pass through zero between -2 and 1. In the special case tht [itex]f(x)[/tex] is continuous and exists everywhere between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] then finding points with opposite signs does guarantee that the function is zero at at least one point between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex].[/itex]
 
D H said:
There is no general method to determine whether some function [itex]f(x)[/itex] has any zeroes. Suppose you evaluate the function at two points, [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. If the function value is positive at both points (or negative at both points), there might well be no points or two points or four points (or ...) between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] where the function is zero. (Note: In saying this I am counting double zeros such as x2=0 as two zeros). You don't know which is the case and there is no general way of knowing.

Suppose you get lucky and find that [itex]f(x_1)[/itex] and [itex]f(x_2)[/itex] have opposite signs. You still don't know that the function passes through zero between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. Consider [itex]f(x)=1/x[/itex] for example. [itex]f(-2)=-1/2[/itex] and [itex]f(1)=1[/itex], but the function does not pass through zero between -2 and 1. In the special case tht [itex]f(x)[/tex] is continuous and exists everywhere between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] then finding points with opposite signs does guarantee that the function is zero at at least one point between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex].[/itex]
[itex] <br /> Gotcha. Thanks for explaining D H.<br /> <br /> Casey[/itex]