Why has it been so hard to cominbe Gravitational Forces with

In summary: While there is no concrete proof of the existence of gravitons, quantized theories of matter may necessitate their existence.[citation needed] Supporting this theory is the observation that all other fundamental forces have one or more messenger particles, except gravity, leading researchers to believe that at least one most likely does exist; they have dubbed these hypothetical particles gravitons. Many of the accepted notions of a unified theory of physics since the early days of quantum mechanics have
  • #1
1,291
0
Why has it been so hard to combine gravitational forces with that of electrical forces?

I'm curious. What are the major underlying problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
because i guess laws of gravitational forces apply to both large and small particles but the laws of electric forces apply to only point charges
 
  • #3
I am in way over my head here, but perhaps because we can "find" electrons & protons, but we haven't found the elusive monopole, the "graviton".

Fish
 
  • #4
I am in way over my head here, but perhaps because we can "find" electrons & protons, but we haven't found the elusive monopole, the "graviton".

Fish
 
  • #5
Electrodynamics is described properly with Quantum Electrodynamics. QED is a subset of RQFT which can be used to describe electromagnetic, strong, and weak nuclear forces. One of the main assumptions of RQFT is that fields obey the principle of superposition.

Gravity is described by General Relativity. One of the features of GR is that it is non-linear. That is, within GR principle of superposition does not work.
 
  • #6
In General Relativity, gravitational force is caused by curvature in the space-time continuum which is supposed to be just that, a continuum. The Standard Model of forces by which the Electromagnetic, Strong and Weak forces abide states that forces are explained by quantum interaction of particles exchanged between objects acting on each other through one of these forces, thus, the strength of these forces come necessarily in quantized amounts, discrete bundles, if you will. This directly contradicts General Relativity. The reason we cannot simply adapt General Relativity to work with the Standard Model is because we have not found the particle which mediates gravity. There are also the problems of Dark Energy and Dark Matter yet to deal with.
 
  • #7
soothsayer said:
In General Relativity, gravitational force is caused by curvature in the space-time continuum which is supposed to be just that, a continuum. The Standard Model of forces by which the Electromagnetic, Strong and Weak forces abide states that forces are explained by quantum interaction of particles exchanged between objects acting on each other through one of these forces, thus, the strength of these forces come necessarily in quantized amounts, discrete bundles, if you will. This directly contradicts General Relativity. The reason we cannot simply adapt General Relativity to work with the Standard Model is because we have not found the particle which mediates gravity. There are also the problems of Dark Energy and Dark Matter yet to deal with.

So then does Newtonian gravity able to blend in with the forces of electromagnetism?
 
  • #8
Nano-Passion said:
So then does Newtonian gravity able to blend in with the forces of electromagnetism?

No, the Newtonian view of gravity also allows for any value of force, so it is not quantized, like the Standard Model predicts it should be.

It IS possible to unite gravity with the other three forces, and we have done it, in fact, but only in theory. If we could find evidence of gravitons, it would bridge the gap between quantum gravity and general relativity quite elegantly AND would allow gravity to fit in with the other three fundamental forces. It wouldn't mean GR is wrong, just as Newton's theory of gravity is not wrong, but only applicable on a certain scale. There are other theories which only attempt to reconcile GR at a quantum level but do not try to unite gravity with the other forces, like Loop Quantum Gravity. We do not necessarily know that Gravity must fit into the Standard Model, but many (I think probably most) scientists believe it should.
 
  • #9
soothsayer said:
It IS possible to unite gravity with the other three forces, and we have done it, in fact, but only in theory.

We have? Can u please show me. :confused:

Oh, are you talking about the standard model?
 
  • #10
The other forces are mediated by measurable quantities of energy. Gravity is mediated just by spatial distortions, which we are not able to measure as physical quantities.
 
  • #11
Nano-Passion said:
We have? Can u please show me. :confused:

Sure, for example, String Theory has done it, mathematically. However, String Theory has not been experimentally tested yet, and there are still problems to work out. The discovery of the graviton would basically prove that gravity could be quantized, here's what wikipedia has to say about it:

contrary to the popular claim that quantum mechanics and general relativity are fundamentally incompatible, one can demonstrate that the structure of general relativity essentially follows inevitably from the quantum mechanics of interacting theoretical spin-2 massless particles [2][3][4][5][6] (called gravitons).

While there is no concrete proof of the existence of gravitons, quantized theories of matter may necessitate their existence.[citation needed] Supporting this theory is the observation that all other fundamental forces have one or more messenger particles, except gravity, leading researchers to believe that at least one most likely does exist; they have dubbed these hypothetical particles gravitons. Many of the accepted notions of a unified theory of physics since the 1970s, including string theory, superstring theory, M-theory, loop quantum gravity, all assume, and to some degree depend upon, the existence of the graviton.
 
  • #12
There's also the very pragmatic consideration of the impossibility of getting data to verify a theory. Gravity is extraordinarily weak relative to something like the EM force thus its effect at the quantum level is for all possible intent and purposes non-existent (any effect it would have would be ludicrously far back in terms of decimal places). Similarly, we know from Quantum Mechanics that as we move to larger and larger systems something called decoherence tends to wash out any quantum mechanicness such that at the scale of galaxies and solar systems (where GR is experimentally verified) its presence is just as meaningless as GR was at the quantum level. Any situation where both GR and QFT are important (like black holes or the big bang) are of course outside of our ability to ever experiment with. Thus, all mathematical considerations aside merging the two theories in such a way that we could verify our correctness is quite the tall order.
 
  • #13
There's a conceptual gap too, whereas the Electronuclear forces act between objects, Gravity acts between objects using the space time continuum, so are we sure Gravity should conform to the Standard Model? It would seem to me as though Gravity was inherently different from the other three fundamental forces, this would also explain its weakness.
 

1. Why is it important to combine gravitational forces with other scientific theories?

It is important to combine gravitational forces with other scientific theories because gravity is a fundamental force that plays a significant role in shaping the universe and understanding its interactions with other forces can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the laws of physics.

2. What challenges have scientists faced in combining gravitational forces with other theories?

One of the main challenges in combining gravitational forces with other theories is the fact that gravity is a very weak force compared to other fundamental forces like electromagnetism. This makes it difficult to reconcile with other theories that rely on stronger forces.

3. How has the concept of space-time helped in understanding the relationship between gravitational forces and other forces?

The concept of space-time, introduced by Einstein's theory of general relativity, has helped in understanding the relationship between gravitational forces and other forces by providing a framework for understanding how gravity affects the fabric of space-time and how this affects the behavior of other particles and forces.

4. Can the principles of quantum mechanics be applied to gravitational forces?

Currently, there is no widely accepted theory that combines quantum mechanics with gravity. The principles of quantum mechanics and gravity seem to contradict each other, leading to the search for a unified theory that can reconcile these two fundamental theories.

5. What implications would a successful combination of gravitational forces with other theories have?

A successful combination of gravitational forces with other theories would have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It could potentially lead to a better understanding of the origin and evolution of the universe, as well as enable us to make more accurate predictions about the behavior of matter and energy at both the smallest and largest scales.

Suggested for: Why has it been so hard to cominbe Gravitational Forces with

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top