Why Has My First Question Received No Input?

  • Thread starter Thread starter france123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Input
AI Thread Summary
The user expresses frustration over receiving no responses to their first question, seeking insight into the lack of engagement. They speculate that the question may be perceived as absurd or unclear, leading to no feedback. The specific question pertains to a funnel in a vacuum, which they mention is detailed in a previous post. The user acknowledges their amateur status and seeks clarification on the type of input desired. Overall, the discussion highlights challenges in communication and engagement within the forum.
france123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Just a little input...

Not sure why my very first question has not received any input? I was hoping on a little insight. Maybe the question is just absurd, and no one wanted to waist their time. Or no one could understand it? Who knows... Amateurs anyway! (thats me)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


well, um... to me at least, it's not exactly clear what sort of input you're looking for :-/
 


I posted a question about a funnel in a vacumme yesterday
 


its the 20th post below this one. thanks
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top