Why/how does integral of solid angle = pi?

Click For Summary
The integral of solid angle, represented as ∫∫dΩ, equals π due to the limits of integration for spherical coordinates, specifically when integrating θ from 0 to π/2 and φ from 0 to π. The discussion highlights that the solid angle dΩ is defined as sinθ dθ dφ, and the integration process leads to the result of π. The confusion arises when relating this result to flux and intensity, where the formula F = L/(4πD²) implies intensity I = F/Ω, suggesting I = L/4D² if Ω equals π. However, the text also introduces the radius of the source, R, complicating the relationship, as it indicates that Ω can also be expressed as R²/πD², leading to multiple interpretations of the solid angle. Understanding these relationships is crucial for resolving the discrepancies in the calculations.
ck99
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hi folks, can someone help explain this in words of one syllable or less? I am looking at a text that compares flux and intensity of a distant source, and it states that

∫∫dΩ = ∏

I know that

dΩ = sinθ dθ d∅

but I don't understand where the given result comes from. What are the limits of integration here, and how does it all work? I assume that we treat the distant source as a circle projected onto our sphere of view, but in that case surely the size of that circle must come into the answer somehow? (EG a large source like the sun would subtend a larger area than Jupiter, they can't both have an area of ∏!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you know that d\Omega= sin(\theta)d\theta d\phi you know that \int\int d\Omega= \int\int sin(\theta) d\theta d\phi. And that, assuming for the moment that the limits in one variable do not involve the other, is -cos(\theta)\phi. Since we are free to orient a coordinate system any way we want, we can assume that the lower limits of integration are \theta= 0, \phi= 0. And we then want upper limits so that -cos(\theta)\phi= \pi. There are several different combinations of \theta and \phi that will do that. Taking \phi= \pi, the largest possible, we would need -cos(\theta)+ cos(0)= -cos(\theta)+ 1= 1, cos(\theta)= 0 which gives \theta= \pi/2. But taking \phi= \pi/2 we would need -cos(\theta)+ cos(0)= 1- cos(\theta)= 2, cos(\theta)= -1 so \theta= \pi.

\theta from 0 to \pi/2 and \phi from 0 to \pi or \theta from 0 to \pi and \phi from 0 to \pi/2. Which do you prefer? Since you are free to orient you coordinate system however you like are they really different?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your response; I understand now how that result is reached but now I don't see how it relates to my problem. In this text, it says that flux F = L/(4∏D2) where D is the distance from the source and L is its luminosity. Then it says that intensity I = F/Ω, which implies that I = L/4D2 if Ω = ∏, but in fact it states that I = L/4R2 where R is the radius of the source!

This last result would be true if Ω = R2 / ∏D2 so I did some research, and the closest I can find is that the solid angle subtended by a distant source is given by area/D2 or ∏R2/D2. (that last result comes from page 5 of this link http://www.drdrbill.com/downloads/optics/photometry/Solid_Angle.pdf )

So I have three different answers, and I can't see how they link together!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K