Why is CERN better known than ITER?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexgmcm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cern Iter
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the disparity in public awareness between CERN and ITER, with many participants noting that while CERN receives significant media coverage, ITER, which has the potential for greater long-term impact on energy production through fusion, remains relatively unknown. The conversation suggests that CERN's established reputation, effective public relations, and historical contributions, such as advancements related to the internet, contribute to its prominence. Participants also reflect on the general public's fascination with theoretical physics over experimental physics, indicating that complex theories capture more interest than practical applications. The dialogue touches on the challenges of communicating less glamorous areas of physics to a lay audience and the importance of public perception in securing funding for scientific research. Overall, the thread underscores the complexities of public interest in science and the implications for funding and research priorities.
  • #31
humanino said:
Well at least without their contribution it's not clear when it would have happen. How it happened is quite an interesting story.

Sure, but we're not talking about *the internet* (which is TCP/IP and the entire non-central networking idea behind it). They invented ONE (successful, true) protocol on top of it, which was a networked hypercard system, and they USED the internet to do so. usenet already existed (on the internet), email already existed, FTP already existed. They just added one more protocol, for the hypercard thing, which was HTTP (and the markup language HTML). BTW, the HTTP from CERN was HTTP 0.9, which was nothing else but a cooked-down version of FTP.
I'm pretty sure that if CERN wouldn't have invented it, somebody else would have done so quite quickly. I don't want to do away with CERN's merit in inventing the WWW, but claiming that they invented *the internet* is to me, quite shocking, as it already existed for about 20 years when they claimed to do so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
vanesch said:
I'm pretty sure that if CERN wouldn't have invented it, somebody else would have done so quite quickly.
This is a belief. Was the invention of optical fiber as important ?

Besides, if one really wants to go into this, one must still recognize the importance of public research (this time not CERN) on ARPANET.
 
  • #33
humanino said:
This is a belief.

Of course, given that it is about a counterfactual situation, it can not be anything else but a belief. However, the reason why I think it was an inevitable invention was that it was beginning of the 90-ies, when graphical user interfaces started to become wide-spread (first macintoshes, first versions of windows,...). As such, all the pure ascii-based internet protocols would have gotten sooner or later something that gets a bit more "clickable", and hypercard was already a locally existing graphical user interface document access system. You only needed to do it over a network.

first mac: 1984
first windows: 1985
Notecards: 1984 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoteCards
Hypercard: 1987 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercard)
Tim Berners Lee (at CERN) invents HTTP and HTML in 1989-1990.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners_Lee

but IMO everything was "ready and set" for this move.
 
  • #34
vanesch said:
first mac: 1984
first windows: 1985
Notecards: 1984 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoteCards
Hypercard: 1987 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercard)
Tim Berners Lee (at CERN) invents HTTP and HTML in 1989-1990.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners_Lee

but IMO everything was "ready and set" for this move.
Digging even further back in time,
Memex: 1945, Vannevar Bush http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush
Project Xanadu: 1980s, Ted Nelson http://wired-vig.wired.com/wired/archive/3.06/xanadu.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
WarPhalange said:
Every year we get a stream of freshmen who want to major in physics and when I ask why, they always say they are interested in "quantum" and "string theory" and "relativity". The catch? They have no idea what those things are even about.

Its kind of why women look better at closing time, you're just too drunk to really notice them properly by then.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
14K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K